It's not an insult to call stupid ideas stupid. ;) It's stupid because it doesn't solve any of the problems you claim to want to solve, and I proved that to you in my post. The key word here is "your solution," not "you." It means that this isn't a personal insult, but rather an insult directed at your solution. Apparently, you have trouble distinguishing between the two. If you identify so strongly with your own thoughts, then we really have nothing to discuss. This demonstrates a high (perhaps even narcissistic) devotion to your ideas as the only correct ones, and it doesn't bode well for a constructive debate.
Perhaps for these same reasons, you cling so tenaciously to the idea that anything can still be achieved with what you're trying to achieve on the hive. Despite numerous voices trying to dissuade you from this idea, you ignore them all because you clearly think everyone is wrong except you. Secondly, I never said anything about profits, so you made up your own mind by assuming that people criticizing DV are only thinking about paying out tokens, which also allows us to see a certain pattern in your thoughts. In fact, your way of thinking, as demonstrated in many of your statements, doesn't differ radically from the way of thinking of the faction dominating the hive, and perhaps that's why your profile still has 74 reputation, and you haven't yet experienced the problems that make this blockchain a useless place for openly expressing yourself and your views.
You believe in a mystical drain, a decline, a withdrawal, and then a return to glory. I laughed so hard! XD Man, come back to earth. Once Hive settles down, those with their hearts in the right place will come to Blurt or give up on the graphene network altogether, rather than trying to resurrect a corpse that would require so many costly and time-consuming code changes (and the number of these changes increases over time) to fix what needs fixing. It's truly not worth it.
So why would these people do this when a rapidly developing alternative with experience in running a new version of this blockchain without DV is waiting just around the corner?
People will simply migrate to this system, which has proven to be more resilient, useful, and suitable for the new reality. It's already slowly happening, you just don't want to see it, so you'll stay here like the band on the Titanic with your stake until the last witness turns off the lights and ship will sink, and you'll keep telling tales like that old man by the fireplace, that "someday the hive will be reborn again, better and more refined, it's just not that day yet." XD No, it won't be reborn because the leeches aren't stupid :P Even on Blurt, Blocktraders didn't cash out all their shares, only half. The leeches always leave their tentacles somewhere to gain control in case a project starts to gain popularity and wealth. When that day comes, they move in to create new sources of profit. The only thing that can protect against this are the proper mechanisms built into the blockchain from the beginning before that happens. And so, even if your scenario were to prove true (which I doubt, because from what I understand, Hive will soon undergo major sheep-shearing changes that will be even harder to reverse), they'll return right at the moment of "return to glory" and ruin Hive once again.
But what can I say... have fun ;)
RE: If You Were To Build Hive From Scratch Again What Would The Community Want to Do Differently?