Man has no specific environment, no environment immovably organized by his own instinctual association. There is no man-world as in one may discuss a dog-world or a horse-world. In spite of a region of individual learning and aggregation, the individual dog or the individual horse has a to a great extent settled relationship to its environment, which it imparts to every single other individual from its particular species. One evident ramifications of this is dogs and horses, as contrasted and man, are considerably more limited to a specific geological appropriation.

The specificity of these animals' environment, be that as it may, is substantially more than a land delimitation. It alludes to the organically settled character of their relationship to the environment, regardless of whether geological variety is presented. In this sense, every single nonhuman animal, as species and as people, live in shut worlds whose structures are foreordained by the organic equipment of the few animal species.

Man's relationship to his environment is portrayed by world-openness. Not just has man prevailing with regards to setting up himself over most of the earth's surface, his relationship to the encompassing environment is wherever defectively organized by his own particular natural constitution.

The last mentioned grants man to take part in various exercises. In any case, the way that he kept on living an itinerant existence in one place and swung to horticulture in another can't be clarified in terms of natural procedures.

This does not mean, obviously, that there are no naturally decided constraints to man's relations with his environment; his species-specific tactile and motor equipment forces evident impediments on his scope of potential outcomes. The characteristic of man's organic constitution lies rather in its instinctual component.

Man's instinctual association might be portrayed as immature, contrasted and that of the other higher mammals. Man has drives, however these drives are exceptionally unspecialized and undirected. This implies the human organism is fit for applying its unavoidably offered equipment to a wide and always factor and differing scope of exercises.

This quirk of the human organism is grounded in its ontogenetic improvement.' Indeed, in the event that one takes a gander at the issue in terms of organismic advancement, it is conceivable to state that the fetal period in the human being stretches out through about the first year after birth. Essential organismic improvements, which in the animal are finished in the mother's body, happen in the human newborn child after its partition from the womb.

The human newborn child isn't just in the outside world, however interrelating with it in various complex ways. The human organism is along these lines as yet growing naturally while effectively remaining in a relationship to its environment. As such, the way toward getting to be man happens in an interrelationship with an environment.

This picks up essentialness on the off chance that one mirrors that this environment is both a characteristic and a human one. That is, the creating human being interrelates with a specific common habitat, as well as with a specific social and social request, which is interceded to him by the noteworthy other people who have charge of him.

The survival of the human baby subordinate upon certain social plans, the bearing of his organismic improvement is socially decided. From the snapshot of birth, man's organismic improvement, and in reality a substantial piece of his natural being accordingly, are subjected to proceeding with socially decided impedance.

Image Source

References:
https://creation.com/differences-between-humans-and-animals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
https://www.animalsandsociety.org/human-animal-studies/courses/has-courses-in-psychology