The old wine is better, people claim. And as wine is seasoning the same does business. So maybe the two years long ICO strategy, the Science Root took is the right one?
The Science Root concept is pretty young. It has been invented slightly more than one year before. Since the April 2017 the team worked on product development realising an alpha prototype of social network in April this year. As I wrote before in previous articles, the ICO will last two years. More about it you can read in this article.
During the last couple of months, the team collected some significant prizes like:
PROs and CONs
PROs
Not bad PR and marketing strategy, high-quality materials
Using a wave platform. It might be a bullseye, can be a catastrophe. The time will show. But I really appreciate that team wants to go against the stream.
Long ICO period – can be a way to avoid the market drops
CONs
- Project’s funders don’t have much experience
- Long ICO I have to put here as well as it requires much more energy, resources and the investing results will be visible much later
This is another article about the Science root. In the next parts, you can read more about the team, the token and the community. Stay tuned.
More about the project you can read here:
Website: https://scienceroot.com/
Whitepaper: https://scienceroot.com/resources/whitepaper.pdf
Onepager: https://scienceroot.com/resources/onepager.pdf
Token:
https://scienceroot.com/resources/science-token-model.pdf
The trial version of Scienceroot Application:
https://app.scienceroot.com/search
Social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scienceroot/
Telegram: https://t.me/scienceroot
Twitter: https://twitter.com/scienceroot
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1754481
Anna Hare