Dear Klaus,
I want to write You about Your claims of a “new social contract” based on a hypothesized detrimental anthropogenic input to climate.
Having spent years researching, I discovered a great deal of cherry-picking of data with dire claims attached, but when a wider scope of data are examined, no problems are found. I have seen historical data actually changed to fit the narrative that Humanity on Our planet is creating a problem!
I have discovered that Our planet is an open system, with solar input and heat loss into space. The “greenhouse effect” therefore is non-applicable to Our planet. That the idea was created to manufacture fear that Our meat supply and energy use are killing Us. It is not true. In fact, statistically all of the climate input is from the sun.
I have discovered in My research that in planetary history, in times of high CO2 (much higher than today), life thrived on Our planet. When CO2 was that high, there was a burgeoning of life. So the idea that CO2 in high amounts is a problem for Our planet is absurd.
Now, I stand sovereign on Our planet, royal and free, and no One stands over Me. No One stands beneath Me lest They choose Their behavior unEthically – We are all sovereigns, though We have been indoctrinated to subject Ourselves to “government.” And given all I have found, to see You pushing lies and fear (as the UN did with the rebranding of the flu to create fear so as to get death jabs into Humanity en masse), I must place You beneath Me.
Nothing You do is Ethical.
And so, I for One will not be signing onto Your “new social contract.” I will hope Many awaken to Their sovereignty and refuse to sign on as well. I do not want to see Your unEthical “contracts” and plans for Humanity come to fruition.
In fact, I work to free Humanity from Your ghastly plans – “You will own nothing and You will be happy” and other platitudes that are untrue. (We will not be happy…) Forcing bugs as “food” is about as unEthical as it gets. If We were meant to live off bugs, We would see Humanity eating them in large quantities around the planet, but, with rare exceptions, no One eats them, even though they are quite plentiful.
I work to create a society of Ethical sovereigns.
May enough of Us claim Our sovereignty before things go Your unEthical way. And, in fact, I will not stand for any of it. I may be One alone now, but I aim for many, many more.
Love always,
Amaterasu Solar
__________________________________________
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.