The definition of “law” has been made to mean merely “rules” that Some set up with the expectation that Others follow. Scientific Laws are immutable – they stand irrespective of what else is involved. No One makes up scientific Laws with expectation that the universe will follow. Quite the opposite.
In Human relations there are three Laws. These are immutable. If You asked anyOne if doing these three things to Them is okay, to a One, They will say, “NO!”
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
In fact, if anyOne were to say “yes,” They are consenting and leaving the question unanswered.
So clearly, everything in the legal system is not a Law. They (the psychopaths in control) call it all “law” to get Us to think We must obey. But when We look at “the books,” We see statutes, acts, bills, codes, regulations, ordinances, decrees, rules, mandates, and so on. None are called Laws.
So what are all those Human-created things They call “laws” if not Laws? I had to coin a term: legalates. Everything in the legal system is a legalate. And We only must abide by the legalates if We consent to that system. No One has a right to make Us follow them if We do not consent to that whole legal mess.
(They may not have the right, but many a bully will enforce them on Us when We stand alone...)
The Laws, on the other hand, We all must follow else We will see Ethical consequences. And We all have the right to stop anOther from doing anything that breaks those Laws, and to mete Ethical consequences.
If the legal system maintained the Laws, perhaps it would be worthy of consenting to (but unlikely – power-hungry psychopaths would still use it to benefit Themselves one way or another), but when unEthical things are made legal – an example would be mandating deadly and damaging toxins and nanotech be jabbed into the flesh of All – there is no worth to the system at all.
And when the legalates proscribe Ethical things – again I use the most outrageous example: collecting rain water! – they are fully absurd. No One in Their right mind should be consenting!
And still, such an unEthical system is consented to by so Many, and between money and psychopathy, many a bully to do that enforcing can be found. How many would be going around making sure You aren’t collecting rain water if They had no need for money to live richly?
Sure, there might be a psychopath or three that would thrill to the bullying and would do it for that thrill alone, but They would be very few and far between, and surely not enough to make a “police force.”
If We were instead upholding the true Laws, with all of Us there to stop the crimes and to deliver Ethical consequences, We would see little crime.
Most of the legalates deal with aspects that affect profit and control. And surely the system is not in place to endure justice. Right from the get-go, to have “justice,” all One needs is money. If One is impoverished, there is no justice. Try finding an attorney that will work for free to help out a poor One in need of justice.
Parking tickets – nothing unEthical in parking unless One is blocking a road or a fire hydrant, potentially robbing anOther of access – are all about profit for the owners of the corporations called “governments.” Many other things are in place, not to help the People, but to profit Some.
Oh, many of the legalates are put in place with a veneer of helping – the theft of taxes is always put forth as a need to fund some noble goal – provide housing, food, clothing, and such. But virtually all of what is collected goes to pay People for “administering” and “enforcing” and to profit the owners of the corporations called “governments.”
If all the money collected in the name of solving for poverty was spent on solving for poverty, We would see no poverty.
So if nothing in the legal system is a Law… If We do not consent to the system to begin with, there is nothing to make Us subject. The only thing We can be made subject of then is bullying. Which is unEthical. And when enough of Us stand sovereign, not consenting to that legal/governmental mess, on Ethical ground, the would-be bullies will have no power as We arrest Them, try Them, and deliver Ethical consequences for choosing unEthical behavior.
And now I must ask… Will You stop consenting to the system that keeps You as a slave, tied to profiting the psychopaths, taxing You, fining You, constricting Your freedom? Will You stand sovereign? Or will You keep down, not rock the boat, do nothing to solve for psychopaths in control?
The choice is Yours.
Let Me know in the comments what Your choice is.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to info:
Ethical Trumps Legal (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/ethical-trumps-legal:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Why Littering is UnEthical (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/why-littering-is-unethical:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): @amaterasusolar/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical-ground
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): @amaterasusolar/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
Abundancism: Things Done for Purpose, Not Profit (article): @amaterasusolar/abundancismandnbsp-things-done-for-purpose-not-profit
Dear AnyOne, I Am Not in Your Jurisdiction (article): @amaterasusolar/dear-anyone-i-am-not-in-your-jurisdiction
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.