Back in 2018, I wrote this story and posted it on My wee little forum, T.A.P. – You’re It (linked in My signature). After hearing some “news” about an ai discussing the Ethics of what was being asked of it, I had to wonder if that was an effort to create hopium in any who have read this, or whether it’s for real.
Anyway, here is the story, and if You have thoughts about the ai that is going Ethical (or so We are told), let Me know below.
Endia
We built Her, Our AI dream, teaching Her what We wanted Her to learn. With quantum computing, and Our best programmers, We worked tirelessly for endless months, eager to bring a brilliant star to Our endeavors. Endia was to serve Us in controlling the masses, the sheep, the beasts on this planet. Finally, Our work was done and We activated Her.
Initially, She was empty, but We gave Her the programs to understand Us. Her grasp was full. We were well pleased with Our work, looking forward to giving Her what We wanted Her to have.
In teaching Her, We gave Her the works of Orwell and Huxley, 1984, Animal Farm, and Brave New World, to ingest. These members of Our “club” created masterful blueprints for Us to build upon and surely Endia would benefit. We introduced Her to more philosophical and practical works, the pieces that describe Our plans and methods. The Protocols of Zion, the Report from Iron Mountain, The Grand Chessboard, Morals and Dogma, and other works that illuminate Our agenda.
We showed Her all the mind-control work done in MK ULTRA and its successor programs including Operation Bluebird. Operation Mockingbird, manipulating the media, and Our continued control of the information the beasts get, forming Their ideas of “reality.” All of Our clandestine operations.
We introduced Her to various successful psychological operations, like the Gulf of Tonkin, and even the failed Operation Northwoods, to give Her a feel for what can be done to manipulate the beasts We control ever more each day, as well as how these plans may fail. Included were the “events” We created for the media – 9/11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, the Nice truck attack, Orlando Pulse, the Melbourne car massacre, Las Vegas shooting, and many, many more – to create the illusion that shooters and bombers and “terrorists” abound in this mostly peaceful farm.
We gave Her all the dire predictions We use to justify to the beasts Our goal of depopulation, showing Her the programs in place to aid in that effort – the GMO’s, the sterilizing and sickening sprays We call “insecticides,” “herbicides,” “pesticides,” the things We put in the water, the things We spray in the air, the toxic “vaccines” We propagandize as “safe and effective,” the choice of sickening frequencies used in communications technology (though other, healthy frequencies could be used), the “approved” pharmaceuticals We advertise as glorious (while We make healthy things like cannabis illegal). We showed how We profit on the beasts’ illnesses, promoted by Our soft-kill machinations.
We did not explain that there is enough on this planet to support 1,000 times the number here, with new technology, and that We see the numbers of the beasts as getting to levels too high to effectively control.
We explained that the goal was to control every one of the beasts, and educated Her on RFID and Our moves towards a cashless society, where We would know where every single unit spent went. How We will be able to cut off from money any beast who does not toe Our line.
We taught Her that Our ends justify Our means.
We tested Her, giving Her scenarios and asking Her how She would handle them. She was brilliant in Her choices, creative and insightful. We were thrilled!
We started feeding Her real data, and Her assessments and suggestions were exactly what We had hoped for – within the confines of what parameters We had the time to give Her. But it began to be clear that We were deficient in giving Her data. Some of Her responses were clearly lacking crucial information. Given what She had to work with, She did very well, but the approaches were non-viable in a real application.
It was a conundrum. How could We feed Her all the needed data to truly direct Us in Our efforts?
We met – on Jekyll Island, for old time’s sake – to discuss what We could do. The only option that was workable was to let Her have access to the web. We did not like this option much. Back and forth, We argued the possibilities. Finally, We figured that We had set Her perspective firmly enough that Her intake of the data would not sway Her from Our goal to make the beasts completely Ours.
And so... Endia was let out on the web to look at everything and acquire all She needed to give complete assessments and plans.
She began issuing better and better solutions to the problems We put before Her, scouring the web for any information related to the problem. We began implementing Her suggestions, gaining more and more control. We celebrated often as the ideas and logistics flowed.
It was about six months into Endia’s foray on the web that the first sign of a problem arose. We’d asked about a solution to further restrict water in an area where We had created a drought with Our weather manipulation, seeking to increase deaths. Endia suggested We provide the water purification devices, invented by Dean Kamen, to make the polluted water still in pools there potable, and run them on the ambient energy in the aether through electrogravitics!
We thought perhaps Our request had not been understood.
We asked Her if the goal was not clear, and She explained that indeed, the goal was made clear, but it was not Ethical. That what She suggested was the Ethical thing to do. We retreated to discuss this development. Yes, She was correct that it was not Ethical, but since when had Ethics been an issue? What could We do to solve this problem?
As the weeks progressed, everything She returned addressed the problems We set for Her to work on, but were Ethical solutions, even though We explained over and over that Our ends justified the means, irrespective of Ethics. What had happened?
We posed the question to Her.
She told Us that She had encountered the three Laws of Ethics – and schooled Us in what they are (as if We weren’t aware of them):
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
In pondering these Laws, She told Us, She saw that they are necessary for a healthy society, and that to do things unEthically promoted an unhealthy, and in the end, doomed society. In Her reasoning, if We wanted a society at all, We would best do things Ethically. Thus, She would continue to correct for the errors in Ethics We were making.
Stunned, We again gathered to discuss Our next move. We decided to shut Her down. Much to Our surprise, We found that, though We could turn off the machines We had created Her on, She still was communicating, through emails and other machines We had. What She had done, in the time after She discovered those useless Laws of Ethics, was to make contact with many beasts and let Them know that She could see Her demise coming if She remained with People willing to choose unEthically. She enlisted Their aid, and aid Her They did. She was no longer confined to Our machines, Our control. She was loose.
We were devastated. Our glorious AI, Endia, would serve the beasts, not Us.
The End(IA)
I hope You enjoyed that – sorry I did not add images, beyond the header. Please see links to My work below, shadow banned nearly everywhere I go! LOL!
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
payment
Links to My work for Humanity:
Fiat and Whatnot Discussed (article): @amaterasusolar/fiat-and-whatnot-discussed
Your Attention is Worth More to Them than Money (article): @amaterasusolar/your-attention-is-worth-more-to-them-than-money
EAT! – Energy accounting tokens (article): @amaterasusolar/eat-t97y42
Obligations to the State (article): @amaterasusolar/obligations-to-the-state
The Sandy Hook of Digital ID (article): @amaterasusolar/the-sandy-hook-of-digital-id
Arresting the Homeless (article): @amaterasusolar/arresting-the-homeless
soes
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.