I have been pondering the idea of “governments.” The idea that someOne, somewhere, can set up a structure of authority and expect everyOne else to be under that authority. Even when They never consented. Even when They were born into a society that has an authority setup, and had nothing to do with the creation of authority over Themselves.
I keep coming back to the fact that...
If I cannot give authority over You to someOne else, how can any governmafia claim to have authority over Me if I do not consent to it?
There is nothing Ethical in claiming authority over Any who do not consent to that authority. And this is why We are so indoctrinated into believing that the governmafia is some nearly divine setup. So that We will think that the Ones in the governmafia have authority whether We consent to it or not.
Interestingly, in the US of A, a founding document specifically says its authority comes from the consent of the governed. And though We are taught (or were – who knows what They “teach” Our children these days) the words found in the Declaration of Independence, no focus is put on the fact that governmafia is unjust when it applies its coercion to Ones who do not consent.
For Ones who consent, They can do as They choose, but Ethically must leave Any who do not consent alone.
Of course, there is nothing Ethical in the legal/governmafia system. If You do not consent and do not comply, They will bully You. They will pay enforcers to come after You. They will lock You up. As if They have any valid authority at all.
Sure, if You consent to being controlled (governed) by Ones in positions in some construct, You are obliged to follow those rules. But if You do not consent, as long as You do nothing unEthical, You Ethically must be left alone.
So… I ponder People who consent to that psychopathic legal/governmafia mess.
I ponder why anyOne, knowing They need Our consent and seeing the unEthical things that emerge from it, still consenting. Even worshiping it. “Muh country…” “Rule Me harder, Daddy…” Even helping the oppression of Others who do not consent. Thinking that “enough People voted for Candidate Smith, so everyOne must stand under the rule of Candidate Smith.”
(Never mind that all governmafias are for-profit corp(se)orations owned by the same Ones, who appoint Their officers/actors, put up the “candidates” They choose, hole “elections” to maintain the illusion We have a say, “count the votes,” and tell Us who “won” (who They appointed).)
I suggest the best course of action is to withdraw consent from anything unEthical.
Yes, We perforce and at the moment must engage that system under duress. Best to make it clear We are under duress when dealing with it. Sign things with “without prejudice,” which means “under duress.”
Are You consenting to this ghastly system? Or do You want better?
Please see links below for more on what We can build.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
Ethical Anarchy (article): @amaterasusolar/ethical-anarchy
Obligations to the State (article): @amaterasusolar/obligations-to-the-state
A Symbiosis of Humanity and Our Planet (article): @amaterasusolar/a-symbiosis-of-humanity-and-our-planet
Stigmergic Emergence of Civilization (article): @amaterasusolar/stigmergic-emergence-of-civilization
I Have a Blueprint (article): @amaterasusolar/i-have-a-blueprint-siwbd7
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): @amaterasusolar/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): @amaterasusolar/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical-sovereigns
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.