I was reading this essay by Sober Christian Gentleman – I highly recommend it! – and was moved to offer My reply to the essay. I present to You today in My weekly article the response:
ESSAY: The True History of Banking
https://soberchristiangentlemanpodcast.substack.com/p/essay-the-true-history-of-banking
In the essay He covers what all happened to money after it went representational – i.e., once it was no longer trade/barter of goods and services. Once it developed into gold and silver representing the energy We add into a system. And I thought I would offer how it came to be that We expect proof that We added Our energy in some way to the system/society/community.
Excellent look at the development of "money," which started as the exchange of good and services in a scarcity environment. Once a community grew beyond the point where everyOne knew everyOne else, there was no way to tell whether someOne added Their energy to the community, and this made taking but not giving possible.
And enough of Us were lazy enough that it became a problem for Those who were working hard to see People who added nothing take the fruits of Their labor for free. Thus the Ones who worked began to demand proof of energy added into the community.
"I'll let You have some of My bread if You give Me some of Your butter."
In abundance, where what One needed to live on was freely available, this practice never emerged. Granted the societies that arose in abundance were very few, and mostly "island paradises." They were usurped when the "western world" came in and took the land, forcing the energy accounting practices on the societies.
From this We can see that the foundational function of "money" – whether in goods and services or anything representational – is to account for the energy We add (at arbitrary rates) into a system.
It was to ensure no "skaters" took but gave nothing.
Today, We can access the vast abundance of Our planet, which could support 1,000 times the number here is well stewarded, but We're still tied to accounting for Our energy added into a system, with most of Us adding Our energy pushing money around. We are cashiers, sales, accountants, debt collectors, tax collectors, insurance People, banking employees...
The abundance is barricaded from Us because We do not have the money to pay for it. Not because it is not there. And thus, most of Us live in poverty, struggling to get by. Trying to get enough energy accounting tokens (EAT) to eat.
What would happen if We added free energy tech?
Here We are, accounting for energy, and if energy was effectively infinite... Where would be the point to accounting for it? It would become like accounting for grains of sand. But if We got rid of money, how would We tell if someOne added Their "fair share" of energy?
Here is where We need to look at the point to ensuring We all add energy in a world where We can now automate needed work no One WANTS to do, and have about 80% of Us doing nothing but pushing money around.
If there is abundance, and We have no need to account for energy, and the work We need done is done by machines – and Those who LOVE that work (lots of People would love to farm, for example, and so They could farm along side the automated farms to cover any disparity between need and availability) – We need no accounting for everyOne's energy added.
We need no EAT to eat.
But what about motive to do things? Wouldn't it become like Wall-e? People just being lazy and doing nothing, getting fat and all?
I have asked everyOne who asked about "lazy People" if that is what They would do. Sit around all day and watch TV, play video games, and eat. To a One, They have all said, "Not ME! I would..." Fill in the blank with something constructive.
Sure, I imaging We might see a couch potato in the mix, but today, virtually all couch potatoes are couch potatoes because They cannot afford to do what They would love to do, and there is little motivation to do other things.
In a world where all of what We need, and most of what We want is freely available, We will no longer be wage slaves, looking for ways to plug Our energy in for EAT, whether We are lucky enough to find a way We love, find the work boring (most jobs), or downright hate it. We will be able to afford to do what We love to do.
And if We have problems arise (which surely We will see), the Ones affected, the Ones who care, can Ethically solve for them.
Any solution that does not break the three Laws is acceptable.
For more, I offer:
And at this point I offered links to My work which were on the same platform as His essay (Substack), but I will add the links, on the platform You’re reading this on, below My request that You pay Me by sharing with 10 People or more. And a few more.
I would love to have Your thoughts!
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
EAT! – Energy accounting tokens (article): @amaterasusolar/eat-t97y42
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): @amaterasusolar/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of-free-energy
They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore (article): @amaterasusolar/they-dont-teach-ethics-anymore
Beneficial Technologies Stifled for Profit and Control (article): @amaterasusolar/beneficial-technologies-stifled-for-profit-and-control
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): @amaterasusolar/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): @amaterasusolar/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
You Are a Multimillionaire (article): @amaterasusolar/you-are-a-multimillionaire
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.