There is a difference between “legal” and “Lawful.” And some of what is called “lawful” is really of legal nature. The legal system is the law of the sea that came onto land through the sewer system. It has more interest in protecting moneyed interests than in justice.
And as for common law, the foundation is Law – the three Laws, which are ancient and cover the things no One would say were okay to do to Them. But there are a few legal-natured things tacked on, which do aim at justice, though some are reiterations of the foundation, and some place some restrictions that the Laws do not.
All in all, to be truly Lawful, something must not break any of the three Laws.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
In Henry’s article, He starts with saying:
I need to preface this article with the statement that I beleive the law is a control system made to trick us into doing what we are told, by people who are lying to us for their benifit, not ours. Unless the law is completely voluntary, it is not applicable to free men and woman. Using force on us to acheive compliance, is just rebranded slavery.
See here for the whole article: https://soberchristiangentlemanpodcast.substack.com/p/essay-the-distinction-between-legalates
It is not the Law that is the control system. It’s the legalates (anything in the legal system), and the “laws” above and beyond the Laws in common law.
And any such system that is outside the Laws, or adds to them, is a system that requires consent. We’re all subject to the Laws, but legalates only apply to the Ones who consent. We can’t say (because over half of Us “voted” for it (never mind the mess that is made when a moneyed Few make legalates as in the legal system!)) that We all must wear black on Thursdays whether We consent or not. Henry got that right (except He called them “laws,” not legalates)!
See the link below on Wearing Black on Thursdays.
The only Laws to which We are all subject are the three Laws of Ethics. They are Laws, not hypotheses, or theories, or random guesses.
These cover the only things that 100% of Us would say were not okay to be done to Us (any who do say they are okay are consenting and leaving the question unanswered). Everything else is a matter of taste – or moneyed interest.
These cover the things We all can arrest (or call for help in arresting) Any who do them. An Ethical trial and Ethical consequences if found guilty then ensue. No twisting of definitions, hiding things in fine print, and all the other unEthical things done in the legal system. The local vernacular is the measure of words, not some Black’s legalate dictionary.
If I were to rephrase what Henry said in that first paragraph, I would say:
I need to preface this article with the statement that I believe the legal system is a control system made to trick Us into doing what We are told, by People who are lying to Us for Their benefit, not Ours. Unless the legalates are completely voluntary, they are not applicable to free men and woman. Using force on Us to achieve compliance is just rebranded slavery.
And indeed, the legal system is used for control and forced upon Us, making it highly unEthical. The BAR sees Us as slaves to be commanded, and forced to comply with the wishes of the legalate makers.
You can read the rest of the article and make the adjustments with all this in mind.
I recommend withdrawing Our consent from the psychopathic legal/governmental system and standing sovereign on Ethical ground – much higher than the legal sewer. And to that end, I offer a few links below with ideas on what We can personally do towards that end.
When enough of Us are doing so, the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet will have little power, and when We remove that dangerous and archaic tool called “money” (in all forms), We will free Humanity to the wealth of Our planet, all living richly, those moneyed psychopaths will have no more power than You, Me, and the next One, and if They break the Laws, They will be petty criminals.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
Wearing Black on Thursdays (article): @amaterasusolar/wearing-black-on-thursdays
Just Stop Consenting! (article): @amaterasusolar/just-stop-consenting
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): @amaterasusolar/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical-ground
Under Duress Only (article): @amaterasusolar/under-duress-only
I Have Authority Over You (article): @amaterasusolar/i-have-authority-over-you
Creating Controversy (article): @amaterasusolar/creating-controversy
The GentleOne’s Solution (article): @amaterasusolar/the-gentleones-solution
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.