Disclaimer:
I am not responsible for what you think or do as a result of reading this post. You Are. The supplying of a way to retain your own copy of the sources in no way transfers or implies liability. You are solely responsible for attaining your own sources and doing your own research to determine the facts. This post is for discussion and entertainment purposes only! The readying of any part of this post is agreement that you indemnify the author.
Lots of people comprehend how to write essays and articles exposing fraud, but have problems in cumming up with the evidence.
Source is
CONSENT
. An agreement to something proposed, and differs from assent. (q. v.) Wolff, Ins. Nat
. part 1,SSSS 27-30; Pard. Dr. Com. part 2, tit. 1, n. 1, 38 to 178. Consent supposes, 1. a physical power to act; 2. amoral power of acting; 3. a serious, determined, and free use of these powers. Fonb. Eq. B; 1, c. 2, s. 1; Grot. de Jure Belli et Pacis, lib. 2, c. 11, s. 6.
2. Consent is either express or implied. Express, when it is given viva voce, or in writing; implied, when it is manifested by signs, actions, or facts, or by inaction or silence, which raise a presumption that the consent has been given.
Excerpt : Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition
Source is nationallibertyalliance.org
Do you see number two exposes the fact that consent is
"implied, when it is manifested by signs, actions, or facts, or by inaction or silence, which raise a presumption that the consent has been given."
So doesn't this mean that if you ask for proof and the inaction of not supplying the proof or remaining silent raise a presumption that the consent has been given thus the implications of the question become one of the facts that raise a presumption of consent.
For informationwar warriors this is a tool to expose the criminal behavior of our servants. One of course need to look up the Acts and the legal code to determine exactly what the process is in court, but as a matter of logic and reason they meaning the so called AGENT must answer the challenge or the presumption stands. I don't remember how long one is suppose to give the AGENT to respond, but I do know some kind of record that you asked the question and the AGENT had a chance to recognize it and respond must be kept. When dealing with these criminals every claim must be proved.
Other post of interest:
Exposing I.D fraud part 1. Principal Agent Relationships / Is the State the principal?
Knowledge is POWER / Divided we fall and together we Stand. Stand Up I say!
Knowledge is Power So lets protect ourselves with Power!
I am not responsible for if you think, how you think, what you think or do. You are. If you like my post consider following and up voting. Peace!
Interested in joining or supporting the Information War?
Use tag #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.
@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause.
Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support.
Delegating Steem Power: Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar.
Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems.
How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more: https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today
Find out more about the Information War. Click Banner!