EVERY TIME A POLITICIAN OR SOLDIER IN THE GOVERNMENT DEFECTS OR IS EXPELLED FROM THE RANKS OF CHAVISM, HE IMMEDIATELY BEGINS TO CRITICIZE HIS FORMER ALLIES.
BUT WHY DO NOT THEY DO IT WHILE THEY ARE IN POSITIONS OF COMMAND IN THE GOVERNMENT?
Elias Jaua, a former minister and key figure in Hugo Chávez's cabinet but now relieved from Nicolás Maduro's government for demanding more internal democracy in the ruling party, makes self-criticism and explains that his exit from the cabinet was agreed:
"Let's say it was an agreed decision. There are no ruptures. There are times when one wants to assume another role. The important thing is not me, but that the country closes the fracture between the political factors and builds a minimum program of national unity that recovers the political stability to be able to start recovering the economy "
"You can not do a linear analysis of these 20 years. There have been different periods. After the death of Comandante Chávez, we see that the opposition's leadership totally ignores the rules of the democratic game and an economic aggression against the country begins that, without any doubt, has harmed the great achievements of the Bolivarian revolution. I am left with the fact that everything that the revolution has achieved in terms of rights and inclusion has never been achieved."
Elías Jaua assured that corruption in PDVSA is the fault of the private sectors. "The entire corruption structure of the private sector remained intact and its contacts within the State quickly corrupted weak officials. Now we are paying the consequences of these deviations "
De Nicolás Maduro commented that he is their leader and companion in the struggle for 25 years and that he recognizes him as such, but that he does not know why Chávez chose him as his successor:I do not know the reasons why he chose Maduro. I can imagine them. As he had been chancellor, he was the one with the greatest international projection and one of the founders of the movement that had good relations with the entire political leadership. But it's my interpretation, the commander never told us why he chose it
Why is it that all these revolutionaries, being marginalized by their former comrades, become philosophical analysts of a situation they helped to create? Will it be "culillo" to know that they are rejected both by them and by us?
Elias Jaua says that the tentacles of the corruption that existed at the beginning of the revolution were not dismantled because the priority was to eliminate poverty, which according to them was raging in the country, and to persecute the corrupt at that time could be interpreted as the establishment of a dictatorship.
Unusual declaration of some of the culprits of all this disaster that surrounds us, because both evils, corruption and poverty, have found their maximum expression within the socialist bosses, has been the perfect breeding ground to giganticly gigantic as never before had happened in the country.
Far from making an apology for the corruption and poverty of previous regimes it is undeniable that these two evils, along with many others, have flourished as never before under the revolutionary umbrella which generalized them to the point that it is not an exaggeration to say that remains "healthy bone".
Because it is clear that this acceptance of errors always comes behind the loss of their privileges as an important piece of the reigning and predatory conchupancia that led to the current disaster. They are guilty and without forgiveness because to continue with power they would continue to do the same, that is, that critical attitude is given by their new condition execrated by their former cronies.
Now comes this, to be struck chest like a little angel, if it is an important part of the expropriation of farms, companies, buildings, colts in PDVSA aircraft,
Being the Chávez promoter of all this disaster that we live today. Your family being the wealthiest
Very true the extreme poverty that they suffered and they needed to fill their pockets at the expense of the government.