Hell of a title huh?

So this piece of trash showed up in my newsfeed. It was such trash I decided to analyze it and explain what is wrong with it.

Titles are frequently used to quickly sum up what something is about, ie this news story about "stolen data from your facebook". For someone browsing through and not reading the article, they would indeed be lead to believe their data was stolen.

Cambridge Analytica (a data firm) used this data it bought from 3rd party app developers to help Trump have better social media advertising. Was it stolen? No. Facebook has shit policies that allow people to buy data(in fact it is why Facebook is free, you are the product, your data is what they sell). Most people know this and realize this, this is no secret at all.

BUT it helped Trump win, so they will say it was stolen. Because the MSM needs to make it sound nefarious because Clinton was their candidate(or someone else). Funny how when Obama's social media team did the same thing they were praised as revolutionary geniuses!!!!

Funny that it wasn't stolen data when Obama used it to win

Lets go through some paragraphs of what Gizmodo says happened and see what bullshit we can find!

"Roughly 87 million people had their Facebook data stolen by the political research firm Cambridge Analytica. And starting today, Facebook will finally notify the people who had their information scooped up. About 70 million are in the US, while the rest are primarily in the UK, Indonesia, and the Philippines."

Wasn't stolen, it was bought.

"How can you find out if your Facebook information was compromised? A notification will appear at the top of your Facebook newsfeed, along with a new button for changing your privacy settings. Even if your information wasn’t swallowed up by Cambridge Analytica, it’s probably a good time to change your settings anyway."

Ohhh wait, so in the first paragraph it was stolen, second paragraph first sentence it was compromised, second paragraph second sentence it is now "swallowed up", and then in the same sentence "it's probably a good time to change your settings anyway". So non-chalant about it like wtf??? It was stolen, then compromised, which are both bad words, but then it was swallowed up and if you want to avoid being swalloed up it is PROBABLY A GOOD TIME TO CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS ANYWAY. The level of idiocy is mind blowing

"If your data wasn’t stolen by Cambridge Analytica, it will appear like the newsfeed on the left. But if your data was obtained by Cambridge Analytica, it will look like the screen on the right. "

Again, "data stolen" in first sentence, next sentence says "data obtained"

"Facebook has come under intense scrutiny over the past month after it was revealed that Cambridge Analytica obtained the private information of 50 million Facebook users. That number was revised to roughly 87 million last week, but Cambridge Analytica wasn’t the only company that was misusing Facebook data."

Now it jumps away from stolen to obtained again. And now it is Facebook's fault it was obtained(stolen), I thought it was the thief who is at fault for stealing right? ;) And then it says "misusing Facebook data". From obtained to misuse.

__
__

"To make things even messier, Facebook has suspended at least two more research companies over the weekend. Facebook booted a data analytics company called CubeYou for misusing data from personality quizzes. And it also kicked out the Canadian analytics firm AggregateIQ. The Canadian government has subsequently launched an investigation into AggregateIQ."

So the data was stolen, but don't worry because facebook suspended two more research companies, because you wouldn't want to BAN or SUE companies who steal your data right, just suspend them? Oh but now it boots a data company for "misuse"(not sue) from personality quizzes rofl. And it kicked out another one(not sue), govt investigating a company for having online quizzes.... FACEPALM

"Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will testify in front of at least two congressional committees this week. Zuck will appear in front of the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees on Tuesday, April 10th and then head over to the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday the 11th. Zuckerberg has so far refused to testify in London at the request of the British government, choosing instead to send one of his lackeys."

He testified while not under oath, which is useless.

"It’s not yet clear if there will be livestreams of his testimony, but we do know that Zuckerberg is doing his homework. Facebook has hired a team of experts to prepare Zuckerberg for his testimony, including Reginald J. Brown, a former advisor to President George W. Bush and former legal counsel for Florida Governor Jeb Bush. The New York Times has characterized the preparation as “a crash course in humility and charm.”"

Again his testimony is useless, not under oath.

"But it will be interesting to see how Facebook weathers the next few weeks, especially since its stock has plunged 15 percent in the past three weeks. Many at the social media company have been caught off guard by the backlash, largely because the kind of data acquisition at the heart of the Cambridge Analytica scandal is more or less standard practice for every other technology company, including places like Google and even Apple. Facebook simply had the misfortune of getting caught after playing fast and loose with who has control over their data."

Oh whats this? Facebook employees are "caught off guard" by the backlash? eh? Because the kind of data acquisition at the heart of this scandal is standard practice for every other tech company(google/apple). But wait, thought the data was stolen? So now Cambridge Analytica didn't steal your data once again, no, it was acquired and a standard practice FB/Google/Apple do. Now FB is under fire for playing fast and loose with who has control of data(but they keep saying it was stolen!!!)

"If you or a friend ever took a “personality quiz” on Facebook, there’s a really good chance that you were a target of political operatives somewhere in the world. It may have been fun to find out which Disney princess you are, but all of those personality traits have been catalogued and monetized. "

Yeah, we know that when we take free quizzes they are selling the data. We aren't dumb.

"Brands have also been fleeing Facebook, starting with Elon Musk’s Tesla and SpaceX. Playboy soon followed suit, and now even Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak says he’s leaving."

Why? To have good PR. They know how it is all done, they aren't stupid. co-founder of Apple, hmm remember just a little bit above how it says APPLE DOES THIS SAME FUCKING THING. Fuck you Steve Wozniak.

"“Users provide every detail of their life to Facebook and [...] Facebook makes a lot of advertising money off this,” Woz told USA Today in an email. “The profits are all based on the user’s info, but the users get none of the profits back.”"

Hmm, didn't you just say you were leaving Facebook because they sell users data, but you do the same thing at Apple when you worked there, oh ok.

Look for contradictions is the lesson for today!

Classic Example Of Propaganda - Gizmodo Saying FB Data Was Stolen

Hell of a title huh?

Lets go through some paragraphs of what Gizmodo says happened and see what bullshit we can find!