Hi ronni,
Yeah, I love the sense of freedom that you still get from living on a houseboat, although even there bureaucracy is rearing it's oh so ugly head.
I wouldn't go so far as to say I'm an experienced investor, if I was pure profit driven I could have done way better. Because I tend to primarily support projects I share at least some philosophical / idealistic views with, I'm not the best person to take advise from if you are in it just for the money.
As for my view on EOS. The technology sounds impressive, but like with ethereum, I think you can safely say that in it's current form it's way overvalued compared to it's practical use. So like with all crypto, do not put in more than you are willing to lose and I really mean lose, because the pricedrops in crypto can be brutal and happen in a flash.
Best case scenario, you have a business-plan that absolutely needs tech like EOS to have the best competitive advantage at succeeding. Do not fall for the pixie-dust-hype, where people believe that just the term "blockchain" or "smart-conctract" will magically fix flawed concepts.
Although riding the gravy-train sounds appealing to a lot of people, if you can make a living off of the use of the tech you could also survive major downturns.
So to recap, while EOS seems to solve a couple of design problems with ethereum, like scaling, the way scripting is implemented, multithreading and governance, the elephant in the room is still a lack of practical and competitive use cases. If after 4 years ethereums primary use case is a very convoluted multisig for apparently mostly bullshit ICOs (which it apparently sucks at as well), that is something to keep in the back of your mind, because that is the market EOS is aiming for.
RE: The face (and part of the body) behind the name (... and the hands ... and the ...)