Watch the video embedded in this tweet.
https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/1060374680991883265
- PressSec
The full video is also available online, and I would encourage you to watch that.
Now, let’s take a few steps back.
Why do people think this is a big deal? Let’s deconstruct what may be driving some of the deep emotions people on the right have about this issue.
Step 1 – Someone was not following directions within 2 feet of the president. That person was also fighting with White House personnel within 2 feet of the president. We have gotten so used to political violence against the president and his supporters that I guess those desensitizing us want us to think this is not a big deal, but it is. It is extremely unwise for security personnel to allow anyone willing to fight should be near any world leader. For the sake of global peace and security someone willing to altercate should certainly not be anywhere near the leader of the free world.
Step 2 – Why was Jim Acosta’s instinct to fight a woman, particularly a woman who was requesting something reasonable? Why wasn’t his first reaction to act courteously, as a chivalrous gentleman would? In Christian, Western history, we honor feminine women and put them on a pedestal. This works because the female form is, in a biological sense, physically attractive to men. It is objectively beautiful. Yet, despite their objective attractiveness to men, women are also physically weaker than men.
If Western instincts were to disrespect women, then because of their attractiveness and weakness with respect to men, women would be easily commoditized and enslaved by men, as they are in so many other traditions (to those traditions’ regularly ultimate demise). Why wasn’t Jim Acosta’s first reaction to honor the intern’s femininity and respect her?– Isn’t this the same mentality Godless heathens like ISIS and AntiFa use? During their attacks, such pagans don’t mind targeting women and children first. When they want to lure enemies into traps, they even commoditize and make expendable the femininity of women and the innocence of children by placing women and children at the front lines of war as human barricades. Yes, I am comparing Jim Acosta to ISIS and AntiFa – his network CNN has supported both.
Step 3 – I think at an imperceptible gut level, loving people sense that the rabblerousing press corps is a Trojan horse for violence against president Donald Trump (God forbid). Many reporters with hard press passes have openly expressed support for AntiFa or actually threatened violence against President Trump and members of his cabinet. They then go into White House briefing sessions, act aggressively towards the president as well as his cabinet, and also fail to follow directions set by the president and his cabinet. They do all of this under the Trojan horse of “press freedom” and “freedom of speech.”
Look at the video of Jim Acosta breaking the rules of the White House briefing room. Why wouldn't that inspire a member of AntiFa (who very likely is also a hard pass member of the Washington press corp) from deciding to do what AntiFa only dreams of doing – wreaking violence against the president or one of his cabinet members directly? Jim Acosta is not just being aggressive because he looking for a new T.V. show. That is certainly not the goal. He has a role. He is the ultimate Trojan Horse for either a coup or to desensitize the public to a potential coup attempt. Make sure to open your eyes, and plant your feet firmly in reality. Acosta’s aggressive behavior was a big deal today, and it has always been part of a major desensitizing effort to help globalists keep control of America. We cannot allow AntiFa-style violence against the president or in any briefing room.
Goodnight.