[youtube 
They tell me that the smart guys, can control the weather these days. To which I respond with, in that case, why is it getting colder, when they would prefer it to be getting hotter? Worse still, what is the evidence that warming up, causes cooling down at the same time, which we are assured is the case?
At the moment, various countries, which give me the impression that they are wholly controlled, while the politicians explain them to be, 'a real and present danger', has caused me to call into question, events in the Middle East. I have long demanded a correct and proper response, to the simple question; 'should the ultimate aim be, to deliver the Peoples of Libya, Iraq and Syria from the clutches of their 'evil dictators', why did it automatically involve, the complete destruction of those countries, when any competent, budding James Bond type Special Agent, could have delivered the same result without need of mass murder?
To suggest that Britain, France and The United States, are not themselves under an even more malign, Evil Dictatorship, having been in the forefront of World-Wide Evil, for more than one hundred years, should raise a laugh in the White Christian Community, which is now being blamed for the very idea of 'Racism', which apparently means White. Just as Hitler and Germany, are being called by, whatever slur comes to hand, and a Jew Fatwa, similar to the one declared against Germany, declaring that Germany must perish, has now been declared against the entire, White Christian World.
Even as I stand here, writing this repetitive screed, I am listening to the narration of a piece of Russian propaganda, which is so far removed from the truth, as to laughable. I have just been told, in all seriousness, that Joseph Stalin, gave an order to Russian troops, that anyone found to have raped a German woman, would be executed.
There are so many things, which should be questioned, despite which they are accepted as fact, without any evidence in support, and after a while, the false tale becomes so generally accepted, that it will bear no investigation, to refuse to accept it brands you as an idiot, which demands the question, in which case, why should anything, which deviates from a 'norm' of some sort lead to the vilification of the questioner?
The most boring topic of all, is the yet to be answered question, of the true shape of the Earth. During recorded history it has been sometimes accepted as round and at other times flat, at the moment we are told it is a globe and sure enough to ask for the evidence is a cause of mirth, as in you don't need evidence, everyone knows it to a globe. OK!
A few years ago I heard a guy on Republic Broadcasting, laying out his belief that there were no such thing as an Atomic Bomb. I immediately thought it to be a joke, because we have all heard the tale of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the huge number of deaths and the massive destruction of both cities and how The United States, is the only rogue State ever to use such an evil weapon.
So what are we to make of the following set of photographs?
They are of Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I am quite sure that unlike me, you will be quite capable of discerning the Fire Bomb damage from that of the Atomic Bomb.
There is an intelligent physicist, living not too far from where I live, who quite credibly explains, how the process described, to create a chain reaction, within the structure of the bomb itself, is laughable and that all of the attacks against Japan were exactly the same as were those carried out against every City in Germany, the difference being, that in Japan, because of an ever-present threat of a volcanic eruption, many of the private homes were made of bamboo, while the brick-built buildings displayed exactly the same damage as did the results of the Fire-Bombing of Dresden, where there were more surviving brick and concrete structures.
My inquiry is being shut down by the Alternative Media, which implies it to be no more than a trick by Cointelpro to discredit the intelligence of those like me, whom are interested, though not entirely convinced by, alternative views. The opposition to what I am writing is almost identical to the response to the shape of the earth, no real evidence at all against the opposing proposition:
Political analyst Franklin Ryckaert, in a few choice words, has dismissed the above conspiracy theory (no nukes) as worthless trash. He points out correctly:(Lasha Darkmoon)
'The political implications of atomic bombs being a fraud would be enormous.
It would mean not only that the US had cheated the world, but also that the UK, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan and Israel had been cheating the world in a similar way.
The “treason” of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg would have been a fraud, and they would have been executed for nothing.
The Israeli whistleblower Vanunu would have been lying also, by “exposing” Israel’s nuclear arms program when no such program existed.
Israel would also be feigning right now to be concerned about a possible Iranian nuclear bomb, knowing that no such bomb had ever been built.
As for the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, that too would have been a total fake, with both Khrushchev and Kennedy cynically aware that they were engaged in a bogus argument about non-existent WMD!
Occam’s Razor would suggest that none of this nonsense is possible'.
As far as I am concerned, everything in the above quote is nonsense. Personally, I did not believe in the old 'Cold War' which we were told was between World War Two allies, Russia and what has since become NATO. This grouping then came to include Rockefeller's Chinese chums, along with a veto at the United Nations, which at the time reserved exclusively for the 'Nuclear States. The whole conspiracy of the Cold War was to suck billions of Dollars out of the Public Purse, by 'pretending' that weapons, which would never be used but which needed constant replenishment, were indeed needed to confront a real threat, in order to keep the funds rolling in.
Other Governments, in India, Pakistan and Israel, quickly took advantage of this crime. Nobody was going to blow the whistle on such a lucrative scam. As for Vanunu and the Rosenberg's, they were a necessary part of the scheme. There is no evidence that Vanunu was ever in prison or that it 'really was his brother' who was quite clearly free. While the Rosenberg's, were an absolute essential part of the scam, without them, there would have been no excuse for a Cold War, if the enemies were not nuclear armed. So be real, the Rosenberg's as was Vanunu, were Jews, I am sure they were all well rewarded for their Patriotic act.
Trump, will no doubt whisper lovingly in Yung Un's ear, 'We both know you don't have an Atomic Bomb, so you keep your mouth shut and we can all pretend you have given it up.' This sort of deal did not do Gadaffi in Libya much good, nor Saddam Hussein, in Iraq but perhaps if China backs up North Korea, they might get a better deal. Trump's status will be much improved if he pulls this off.
There are certain aspects to the notion of a spinning globe Earth, which are quite simply totally stupid. Nobody can explain to me, how an aeroplane is apparently, unable to overcome the spin of the Earth. I have been involved in endless discussions, mainly with those whom have never spent five minutes checking out the ridiculous claims which were daily fed to us all, in the school classroom, which simply do not hold water. They all come tumbling down at the first hurdle, when it turns out that there is no evidence that the Earth actually rotates
The Earth and everything on it, we are assured, is spinning from the West towards the East at one thousand miles an hour, which means that an aeroplane, on the runway, intent on flying West, is already traveling backwards, along with the spinning Earth, at one thousand miles an hour. Should that aeroplane, take off and fly at normal speed of five-hundred-miles-per-hour, forward, with the Earth flashing by beneath it, at one-thousand-miles-per-hour, in the opposite direction, why does it take the aeroplane an hour to reach its destination which is five hundred miles to the East, unless that is it flies backwards and forwards at the same time?
I am sure there is a perfectly logical explanation for this puzzle, however I have yet to come across anyone whom proves capable of providing it. At this moment, I have posed a question to guy, who assures me that he has proof positive that the Earth is a globe. This made me very happy, so I immediately asked him to explain to me how a railway company, would calculate the depth of the cut necessary, while passing an Iron Road, from Cape Town in South Africa to Cairo in Egypt, in order to maintain the track in a perfectly level state, which is essential for a locomotive, which could well be hauling several hundred wagons behind it. I await his response.
Normally people reply, with something that they have made up, off the top of their head, to suit the question. For example, the strange conundrum, which is a part of the above question about trains, is there any such thing as straight and flat? People have tried to convince me that there is an imperceptible slant,in each rail at the join, claiming that wherever you place a spirit level, on the curved Earth, it will always show level, for the spot you are measuring, which will be imperceptibly different from the one before. This response avoids having to explain the apparent absolute 'flatness' of the rails, when measured at either end, even with a laser beam.
We all know how a spirit level works. While laying a rail for a tram or a train, one uses a spirit level, to make sure of the 'flatness' of the track. Which necessitates the digging of tunnels to pass through hills, if necessary. So the question is, while laying a rail-road track, over hundreds of miles is it flat or curved? I will tell you for nothing that every railway track is laid flat, with perfectly flat rails, which are now welded together, in strips of up to five hundred metres. Find a bit of closed railway track and test it for yourself.
Should you lay a track from Cape Town to Cairo, it would, quite obviously, have to be curved, if the Earth is a globe, so from where does this curvature arrive, having welded perfectly flat rails together and checked the flatness with a spirit level? Common sense tells us that should this track be turned onto its side the curvature would be obvious, so how was it achieved, using a spirit level?
I cannot believe that 'gravity' is not capable of overcoming the desire of river water to run downhill, water which has never been found running uphill, and yet can stop the oceans from piling up somewhere down Australia's way, on a Globe Earth, so to suggest that a train twenty-one coaches long, could climb up the side of the Earth, while struggling to mount the slightest of slopes, on top of the world, is hard to swallow.
There is an enormous amount of fun to be had, dreaming up, perfectly sensible questions to which there are no answers, to baffle people whom think that they know better than you do, about all and everything, when in truth we all 'know' nothing about anything. We have all been bamboozled for years and yet 'we' do know as much as 'they' know, because we all had the same education of crap.
None of the things about which I have just written are in any connected,apart from the disinformation attached to all of them. So don't worry too much about the threat, which Dark Moon warns us could come from Cointelpro, they are probably enthralled with this information themselves and Lasha Darkmoon normally writes some interesting stuff.