At first I'm pretty skeptical when there's an incident like the shooting at Mandalay Bay that it isn't what we're told happened. Initially it sounds totally possible that Stephen Pallock had mental issues and just decided out of the blue, to become a mass murderer. Watching the videos on msm of people running and imagining if you had been there and gone through that? It's horrible to think about what those people went through. And 'hoax' accusations sound the usual, tin foil and out there. If you don't bother to question evidence not talked about by msm, or just outright ignored entirely, then what you initially see makes sense. A guy who, for God knows what reason, just went over the mental stability cliff. Hey, it happens right?
Well, I've been really looking in to this shooting and boy do things not add up to the 'official' reports. So far it's looking like we have some pretty strong evidence that the FBI/Locals are definitely lying to us. And I'm not talking about the 'flashes' coming from the 4th floor. In listening to the police scanner recording, it becomes apparent that that light could have been a strobe light like the cop who on the radio originally reported it as a gun flash later corrected. Unless you believe him to be a part of the conspiracy, given the immediacy of the 4th floor assesment, I could believe that was some kind of strobe light. No broken window so how gun fire?
Anyway, there are all kinds of different theories out there but mine? I'm leaning towards the theory that there was some kind of Fast & Furious type FBI/CIA/Homeland Security whoever gun running operation going on. And like Benghazi. And just like those two cases, an operation gone bad. What if we were dealing guns with whichever 'bad guys' we've decided to covertly set up, and Paddock was somehow involved in being somewhat of a middle man. What if the bad guys caught wind of the sting and shot Paddock 'and' the crowd as retaliation?
It just makes more sense to me because those tapes do 'prove' there was more than 1 shooter for sure. If you look at my transcript, of the police radio (tape #2 1:11:00), this is when swat busts into Paddock's room 135 on the 32nd floor. Yet 'after' they kill or he kills himself look what tape #3 at timestamp 7:35 PROVES! You can clearly hear with your own ears, freeging rapid fire gunshots through the radio AFTER Paddock was already dead! Total proof, not conjecture like I'm doing as I'm trying to figure this out. We know this to be true period just on pure, provable, fact.
Now if they lie about the 'lone wolf' narrative, why would I believe anything else they say when I discover 'another' lie? Msm/authorities said he checked in the day before the shooting. Yet, wouldn't you think that the FBI would not have completely easy to access proof of when Pallock checked in? What? The registration book says the day before? But now two separate receipts show otherwise? This video shows a valet receipt on the 25th and a 2-party meal ticket on the 26th If these are authentic (which no one has claimed otherwise) then FBI would have known this.
Ok so, this doesn't prove anything else but I just can't get this gun running theory out of my mind. I could totally believe that the operation went bad fast and the consequences were not known by the angencies involved until it happened. The bad guys showed what happens when you narc them out undercover. Like the Italian crime bosses.
Idk, what do you think?
Source:
