Hey Gav! You've got the concept of private property rights correct. Unfortunately you've got the concept of immigration control all wrong, and by trying to tie private property rights to unrestricted travel by foreigners into our country you've missed the mark.

It's clear that our founders were concerned about at least three challenges when it comes to allowing foreigners into our country: (1) the character of foreigners who would want to immigrate into our country (2) allowing too many foreigners in at one time, and (3) allowing too many foreigners from the same countries and cultures to settle in a certain community. Why would they even have these discussions if they didn't intend to give the government authority to control the flow of foreigners across our borders? That would make no sense.

Good job on properly describing property rights though!