Disagreeing with your positions is now called "trolling"? Funny. I'll give you 4 more quotes from the "Records of the Federal Convention" in 1794 where the founders were debating the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 which deals with the rules of Naturalization. You claimed, incorrectly, that they did not even discuss the admittance of foreigners in their debates.
These clearly indicate many of the founders when discussing Naturalization, were also discussing whether or not to let foreigners into the country, what character they desired in these foreigners, and for how long they should be here before becoming citizens - all related to controlling access to foreigners.
Block me as you wish Gavin. If you feel that truth cannot be presented on your posts, or that the words of the founders should not be presented here as facts, your followers will see that you are the one not standing for truth (link to the document provided below):
[22 Dec. 1794] "The present (Mr. Sedgwick said) he believed the most inauspicious time for the indiscriminate ADMISSION OF ALIENS to the rights of citizenship. A war, the most cruel and dreadful which had been known for centuries, was now raging IN ALL THOSE COUNTRIES FROM WHICH EMIGRANTS WERE TO BE EXPECTED."
"Could (he asked) any reasonable man believe, that men who, actuated by such passions, had fought on grounds so opposite, almost equally distant from the happy mean we had chosen, would here mingle in social affections with each other, or with us? That their passions and prejudices would subside AS SOON AS THEY SHOULD SET FOOT IN AMERICA? or that, possessing those passions and prejudices, they were qualified to make or to be made the governors of Americans?"
"He believed that the amendment now proposed by his colleague, in conjunction with that which had already succeeded, would on the one hand CHECK THE ADMISSION OF FOREIGNERS IN SUCH NUMBERS AS MIGHT BE DANGEROUS TO OUR POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS; and, on the other, that it would NOT EXCLUDE SUCH MERITORIOUS INDIVIDUALS as might be willing to serve the apprenticeship which might qualify them to assume the character and discharge the duties of American citizens."
"The second resolution produced a long conversation, in the course of which Mr. Murray declared, that he was quite INDIFFERENT IF NOT FIFTY EMIGRANTS CAME INTO THIS CONTINENT IN A YEAR'S TIME. It would be UNJUST TO HINDER THEM, BUT IMPOLITIC TO ENCOURAGE THEM. He was afraid that, coming from a quarter of the world so full of disorder and corruption, THEY MIGHT CONTAMINATE THE PURITY AND SIMPLICITY OF THE AMERICAN CHARACTER."
You can have your own opinion, just not your own facts. These are facts showing the founders debating the admission of foreigners into the country. There are plenty more quotes in the record to back this up.
RE: The Truth about Property Rights.