really it comes down to a matter of what proposals get proposed to the DGBB system. taking it back a layer from specific proposals that might help further decentralize voting power, as long as the proposal system gets used by enough people, what should come out the other side is what the voting members "want" as a collective, a hivewant or whatever. so, maybe the first-first first step would be to encourage everyone we know to write a proposal for something, anything that is their best effort of a well-thought-out plan but the topic or implementation can be anything. literally any amount of funding can be requested, etc. then what we need to do is get as many tron operators to vote as possible in a single superblock, like we need to see way higher than 20% response to see the system even attempt to operate, right? and we should encourage people to vote and propose (operators and community-as-a-whole, respectively) however they as individuals feel is right, obviously forming subcommunities as needed and as ideas are respectfully exchanged. then what gets approved on that superblock would be far more representative of what the community all hivewants, and what currently only the landowners (tron ops) hiveagree on.
haven't thought it through too far down that path yet, but next-first step would likely be to get more voting power for those who hold less than what it takes to operate a tron masternode, creating a diversity of governance infrastructure layers to appropriately distribute force. basically the DGBB should become the kevlar vest to society.
what do you think?