You could consider them the majority that doesn't vote, in turn casting their vote against democracy, as democracy is always Majority Rule, and in paradoxical fashion they denounce democracy and have done so for a long time, in fact I wonder when the last time a Majority of the population elected a representative to Congress or Senate, and we're not even talking about the Continental Congress and Senate, but the look-alike impostor, and usually when you don't use force with people that are forcing you, if you sit quietly and don't object even they will call it consent, and equally if you know an impostor is an impostor, treating them as legitimate afterwards is completely on you, because you aprove and you wish to be deceived, so why shouldn't we let you be deceived?
RE: Where has "pure libertarianism" worked?