I don’t like to put myself in a box but this one feels like home.
Nothing about peacefully coexisting and creating consentual agreements with others can be wrong. Period. The use of crytocurrencies is inevitable amongst intellectuals who are more often than not drawn to computer technology. I hate sounding pretentious as if I know better than anyone else, but I find it incredibly hard to find negativity in the grand scheme of crytocurrency. The decentralized aspect screams fairness and allows people on every level to achieve sustainablity. Beyond that, Steem has opened up a whole new realm with the “donation” based economy. The real inhibitor of human potential seems to be outdated and slow to progress political power.
Perhaps the only negative aspect of cryptocureency is how much money people are losing playing the crytomarkets in order to satisfy their cash driven lives. There is an aparent disconnect developed by these people who truly misunderstand the technology they are getting into. For me it is empowering to be in control of my money and seemingly my people’s future. I think we should all take the time to really think about and perhaps condemn such behaviors unless these people are reinvesting and improving the technology for the future.
But who are we to judge? I know, I have a hard time myself because I can truly see things from multiple perspectives and realize that not everyone has had the same experiences. However, I am also an extremely peaceful guy and I think that is reflected in all my life decisions, especially money. I wish the best for everyone and want to provide my family and friends with a future they can believe in rather than a looming anxiety as chess pieces shift around violent influence. I think it is safe to say that those without our best interests in the future are not on my side.
I yearn to be the catalyst in the world around me that sparks faith in others.