If there is anything the citizens of “Nice republic” (formerly the kingdom of judgment) agree on, it is that the bible has a litany of condemnations for judgmental people.
Let me site the Major Article of their magna-carter: “Judge not, that you be not judged…” (Matthew 7: 1-5). For them commenting on any other person’s action(s) violates the Constitution of their perverse Republic. To further Justify their claims they remind you of the encounter between Jesus, the Adulteress, the Scribes and Pharisees. The only thing they take from that story are the words of Jesus “let he who is without sin caste the first stone.” The “people of Nice” then celebrate the part where Jesus bends down to write on the sand, even though without any backing of scriptures, they are the first to tell you “he was writing the sins of the false prophets on the sand.”
So we end up being a fossilized society of truth without justice, of honesty without practice everything becomes acceptable to us because nobody should be judged or corrected because “all men have sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God.”
Utter nonsense!
The greatest intellectual fraud of our time is committed by those who use scriptures for their personal gain and self-vilification. This includes, bishops, priests, pastors and the common men on the streets.
Nobody ever talks about the part when he said to her “Go and sin no more.” Admonishing wrongdoing (different from condemning the wrongdoer) is not contrary to christian precepts, it doesn’t matter what you think.
I think behind this doctrine of niceness is a subtle fear for engagement and debate. It is nothing but a hidden agenda to tolerant anything and everything. The people of Nice are governed by an abhorrent code, it is called RELATIVISM. Everything becomes relative to them and nothing is true or unique.
The only crime for this republic is saying that “Truth never ever changes, and truth won’t stop being true simply because people don’t talk about it. It doesn’t matter how hard we pretend to tolerate falsehood it doesn’t change the stability of what is true.”