I fully agree rod. But that is also why I argue philosophy must be MORE than a mere worldview, as any hack can have a worldview. That said, philosophy simply shows one "how" to approach complexity, it does not provide any real "certainty" beyond what the ancient Greeks called "phonesis"--Heidegger defined this as "circumspective insight", and that sounds about right.
When I teach "phonesis" I use the example of the gunfighter in the "wild" West. The gunfighter always made sure they were in a "place" where they could cover all their angles. Did this mean the gunfighter was always safe/correct, not at all. Rather, it simply meant the gunfighter had some level of wisdom defined by his/her activities and the environment in which they found themselves.
This is why I push back on the idea of philosophy as a mere worldview. But I hear ya, totally.
RE: Applied Ethics: Human Experimentation. Yeah or nah?