The way you phrased your post suggested that the "latter portion" was supposed to be support for the conclusion in the "former portion". I was pointing out that it wasn't. Your bizarre analogy to a roadmap is irrelevant to that point. In point of fact, you provided no actual support of your conclusion. You simply posted a conclusion. There is no reason to think that your conclusion is correct based on what you have posted, because you haven't posted anything that supports it.

Let me provide an example. I could post something like so:

The moon is made of cheese.

"La Luna" is the Spanish phrase for "the moon". "La Luna" is also a type of cheese.*

Do you see what I'm saying?

*This is true.