Don't you think that it is strange that each of us has to pay for a piece of land to live on. We think that we are we are free humans, but that is not totally true. OK, I know that the facilities provided to us in modern life require labor, and I am not complaining about paying for them. What I am actually complaining about is that we even have to pay for a piece of land to live on.
Now you might argue that you need to buy land, because your country is protected by external threats by the government and armed forces and such. However, I am imagining a world where there would be perfect harmony and humans will no more be enemies of each other. Moreover, we would have enough technology to build homes wherever and whenever we want (through 3D printing for example), have decentralized power (like Solar panels) and such. Basically, I am imagining a post-scarcity economy where everything would be in abundance. But, would the land to live on be abundant too?
To answer that question, let us see how much is the human poulation now, and how much is the inhabitable land on earth. According to worldometer, the human population is 7.6 billion right now. Moreover, according to this site, the total inhabitable land (excluding deserts and mountains) on earth is 24,642,757 square miles or 63824 billion m2. This means that each human would get 8326 m2 of land, if it was distributed equally. Now if you were given land in the form of a square, it would be almost 91 m long and wide, which is quite big, isn't it? Even if we allocate half of Earth's inhabitable land for things like forests, roads and agricultural land etc, you'll still get a land which is 45.5 m long and wide.
I'll end this post with this beautiful quote from Mahatma Gandhi.
“The world has enough for everyone's need, but not enough for everyone's greed.”