Theory related to the movement of the Earth has substantial flaws.
1). In the event that an overwhelming stone is thrown straight, it would fall on a similar place from where it was tossed, while as indicated by the hypothesis of the Earth's movement, it must not occur.
However, if the earth were moving towards east, the stone would fall in west in light of the fact that amid the time it went up and and had fallen again, that place of earth from where the stone was thrown, because of the Earth's movement, would change towards east.
Assume, if a stone thrown into the sky took a period of 5 seconds, at that point as indicated by the said speed of the Earth's movement, that is 506.4 yards for each second, the earth would disappear towards east by 2532 yards i.e. around one and a half miles. As such, the stone must fall in the west of that and at a separation of around one and a half miles in any case it would fall on a similar place from where it was thrown. This demonstrates that the said hypothesis of the movement of earth is incorrect.
2). On the off chance say you are trying to kill a bird in the sky, which is approximately a distance of 10 yards away and assume it takes two seconds in hanging the bow and shooting the arrow, at that point when the arrow is shot, that specific place would disappear inside these two seconds at a separation of 1013 yards at a speed of 506.4 yards for every second being the speed of the Earth's movement and in this manner the arrow can never achieve it's intial objective, though it might be underestimated that the arrow would hit the objective. It demonstrates that the hypothesis of the movement of earth is incorrect.
Work of Alahazrat, written in 1339 A.H., published from Raza Academy, Bombay.
Happy steeming loved ones!
