Interesting to hear about what people do with their lives. Everyone already gets a piece of the history of humanity, and it's goddamn personal, but in it should be the potential for life within the lessons one inevitably go through as a matter of living. That's not enough, just the lessons we're forced to realize and we'll end up like our parents: knowing how the world works too late, knowing ourselves too late, a better half of a life already spent on learning the basics, without a suitable lengthy future to apply what was learnt, and perhaps entrenched in money as a religion, unwilling to give what was taken, only wise enough to be satisfied with the lot given to us, so wise that we perhaps believe changing human nature is impossible. It's obvious there must be a cataclysmic event or some different input to live a life better than our parents did. Might as well aim for the highest if the nature of existence is to realize our aims, no matter what we say or do.
Desteni basically wrote about morality covering the current topics and no matter how you look at it, it's different to everything we were given. Being different it will be interpreted as shocking, ruthless, brutal, direct, irrelevant to the self interest in the system, weird, either amazing or amazingly screechy to the ears. Firstly where do you hear about any single person that say the system and exactly our human nature right now is the very reason for abuse, poverty, all the weaknesses of civilization? How free really is our spectrum of debate within the current money and education system, according to TV and news? How fake is the history told in the history books allowed to be published by our world system? What are the interests behind a winning party or country that writes its own history? I ask these questions because if you're really honest, nothing challenges your views or this world substantially to cause change. Everything is done to maintain the seeming equilibrium afforded by ignorance. So when something or someone challenges you, who and what are you? Who and what is ignoring and tossing the message aside, the human being that's living in a physical reality or a jobber in the system? Or a parent who only wants stability at all costs, or a boss unwilling to face his misdemeanors towards many people, all the labels we give to human beings of value to the system, of the system. When Desteni is saying life is not what we make and struggle through it, there's something more, and it's not what we currently are, who are you if you just ignore it? Call it a philosopher's childish game, or frivolous talk?
To me, any point that directly oppose the system and human life on earth and oppose humanity, should be heard and listened to. We're not blind all our input is giving and adding up to the output of humanity which includes greed, corruption, abuse, poverty. Addiction, loneliness, dejection. In the end who is judged when a message calling for the life in people is discarded? The message do not change, its value does not change, but people do. People only ever have the ability to judge themselves, nothing more or less. In the long run, we only ever judge ourselves even if the point is external, it comes back to us.
To me, a message I do not want to hear is a message I must push me to hear. Because usually I don't want to hear things that challenge my foundation, if I hear and understand it I might have to change. But change was an easy choice for me because I did not like every level of the preexistent forms of thought in me, and I did not cheat money out of my preexistent design. I disliked me, and I was not getting money for being me, so change was easy. Anyway there's usually specific value in hearing a message one doesn't want to hear anymore. If you haven't realized the nature of the mind is to hoard and safeguard itself.
Anyways think about what in your routine will push you in the direction you want to be headed. What input and consideration you will give to yourself to at least not do what your parents did.