Last night I watched ipl match between kkr and SRH. SRH won by 5 wkts.
If we summarize that match, who was the best player?
We can consider player of wining team only..
- Billy Stanlake: 4 over 21 run 2 wkts.
- Williamson: 50 run at 44 balls.
3.Bhuvneshwar Kumar: 4 over 26 run 3 wkts. - Shakib Al Hasan: 4 over 21 run 2 wkts, in batting 27 run at 21 balls, in fielding 2 extraordinary catch.
Above 4 were the competitors for man of the match. For the winning of SRH those people played very well.
I want to know which performance was best if you choose one?
The match officials declared man of the was Billy Stanlake of his 2/21.
Was Billy Stanlake's performance more better then Shakib's performance??
I can not understand what is the measurement of player of the?
But according to social media and some newspapers observation Shakib was the best player of that match.
Image source: http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8048/report/1136570/kolkata-knight-riders-vs-sunrisers-hyderabad-10th-match-ipl