I would be quite interested to hear a legitimate reply to this topic - rather than baseless insults and appeals to dubious authority.
His theories are quite compelling and I have not seen any credible scientific rebuttal on them to date. I don’t have the credentials to make a claim one way or the other, nonetheless it seems rather dubious to ignore the actual meat of the argument (the mathematics) and continue on with these character assassinations.
As for other physicists, check out Brian Cox or Elizabeth Rauscher.
RE: The theory that explains everything and anything! Pt.1/3