Interesting sentiment, but I can't help but notice a few things that simply don't make sense to me in this post of yours.
Being a spiritualist or religious means that you are now an artist, the least to say, if not an alchemist, it means that you stopped being a drone driven person governed and lead by collective mind and victimising yourself all the time.
I don't really know about being a spiritualist (as I'm not really sure what it means exactly, maybe you can help), but I'm sure being religious doesn't free you from collective mind and group think, it puts you under the influence of those and quite powerfully so.
How exactly does being a spiritualist makes you an artist really how is that better than reason and rationality? If you want to react but not overreact, aren't analytical skills a much better tool than spirituality?
Isn't there a chance that being spiritualist just makes you a bit more smug about claiming that you know what the right reaction is instead of admitting you can't really alway be sure?
If you view my reply as an act that is here to provoke you, keep in mind that I wrote this to provoke you to think because I see objectionable points, not because I think you are a push-over as I have no idea or actually care that much if you are or aren't.
Cheers! :)
RE: What are the consequences of being spiritualist