Let's understand that levels of RF exposure from wireless networks are so minuscule that the temperature increases are barely significant when measured by instrumentation and have no affect on human health…

As a matter of fact, the low frequency, at basically similar RF exposure levels, the body absorbs up to five times more of the signal from FM radio and television than from base stations.

Understand that these frequencies that are often used in FM radio stations are around about 100 MHz and in TV broadcasting are around 300 to about 400 MHz these are much lower than those put out in mobile telephony (roughly 900 MHz and 1800 MHz.) Furthermore, radio and television broadcast stations have been in operation for the past 50 or more years without any adverse health consequences being established.

There has been no long term studies;because, no one has been willing to test this out and the amount of time that it takes to run a test is years. This is a fear feeding article. This feeds fear into society. Information like this is a partial cause for large scale subtle anxiety.

How can you better understand Wi-Fi? Wi-fi routers are weak transmitters even more so than mobile phone masts, and users sit away from them. The level of energy produced by a Wi-Fi router is very low, far too low to be able to disrupt DNA. If you want to live that way then great that is your choice, but understand facts are facts, not distorted ideas. To call this out would come with the obvious defense of "It must be the government."

This would bring itself near to conspiracy beliefs and ideas, and that is nothing more than a "blame culture" that casts a lot of finger pointing. I think you can take away from learning more from different sources, not just the sources you deem "worthy". We as human beings, need to ask more questions before deeming a source of information as worthy. In todays age, it would benefit us by humanity scrutinizing internet information.

A double blind long term study is in order. Till then, I will wait on that one.