In social reality it is identified that almost everyone has a desire to be number one. Worse yet the ambitious person to be the leader hardly ever does an assessment and introspection of self or self-ability; whether able to be a leader, whether the self has the soul of the leader, whether self-capable of self-management and others, and so forth.
Regardless of the above logic, it is evident in the reality of many people who force themselves to be leaders in a public institution / institution-both in educational institutions and in bureaucracy. While the soul of leadership owned by the person concerned is no more as a mental mafia or group of gang drinking coffee. This condition can be analyzed from a number of leadership models that when the ruler is not able to lead, reconcile or unify all components of the nation, employees or subordinates. Preferably a priority and a hate to be sacrificed and scapegoated in all its policies, is dramatic and heartbreaking.
When these people are chosen and elected as leaders, it is possible to analyze a number of negative indicators generated when the power goes on. For example, when a rule is made-without first realizing he or she breaks it, but for the territory or institution it leads to be strictly applied. Related to this context, the virus of collusion, corruption and nepotism increasingly give fresh wind and live happily during his leadership.
Similarly, in any public decisions and policies it makes is always in conflict with the environmental situation, the needs of the people or institutions and the foundation of a foothold theory. From the results of observation to the world's figures, can be explained that leaders who can not lead often blame the entire contents of the institution, environment or people he leads. So when solving a problem or solution he just uses the recipe noble mafiaya blindly, sporadically, rough and arrogant without being analyzed and steeped sitting issues or cases that contain ambiguity.
Sometimes also the boss is very illogical in addressing and assessing his subordinates, and even with a shrewd and deliberately trying to politicize the conditions to blame the performance and personality of his subordinates. In fact, the leader of this drool is very eager to get rid of his men systematically during his power. Indications of this boss's aggressiveness behavior, many people are out of office. Either because it is unpopular, different political views, gust of wind devils or because of the ignorance of the boss himself who knows everything so not able to fully understand the qualifications, strengths and abilities of his men. Who looked in the eye and thought was the shortcomings and mistakes of his men.
In reality the characteristics of stupid leaders, such as allergies to criticism, angry, inflammatory, non-authoritative, frank speech, policymaking made inconsistent, inconsistent, never self-introspective, never received input or opinions of others, likes to boast of self, likes to see the ugliness of others, and others. In addition, the boss who type 'drool' is also not aware of the end of his power so that while in power he always reap a disaster for each of his men in various modus operandi, either from the way of communication, interaction or also his actions that often hurt the people and his men.
It is unfortunate that the type of leadership who is unable to understand themselves, others and the environment. For what is done, gradually will be about him. This is called the law of karma. The law of karma will prevail while humans live. When someone hurts someone intentionally and consciously, just waiting for his reply will be hurt someday. Whereas if the leader is smart and clever in understanding the psychological condition of his work, perhaps there is no such 'rough' treatment. This is the phenomenon of the ignorant leader who does not know how to lead, but his ego is eager to rule beyond his capacity. As a result, all the scolding, chaotic or unbelievable chirp out there became the main menu every day not realized.
True like the old saying, "think first income, regret then not useful". Only leaders who are spirited leads who are able to interpret and understand the conditions of reality leadership. To interpret this usually exists in someone who is sincere, smart and smart. However, if one who forces himself to become a leader, do not expect them to understand themselves as leaders, that there is revenge to those who are considered political opponents. Wallahu'alam.
