¿What do we know on which the good thing or that is the bad thing?

Only words are simple, which marks the difference is as you take it or value it, as the same form values as you you love you himself, clear that the reality is so exhaustively both roles and what today it protects, tomorrow it turns into pitfall that it shuts up or them same food that show us, which they accelerate I process them metabolic, that are destroying us. To every step any existing one is debated between the valuable thing from which they derive collateral evil for one, which basically harms us but can offer us occasionally in the search of a benefit earlier or later, as all that it is turns out to be an infinite compared with the force, which they produce in the immense forum that forms the universe.

Source of image of pixabay

to look what turns out to be to us valuable and to avoid as far as possible the evil that threaten us, the animals it is provided with his instincts, this way to be overloaded of routines but many perplejidades save themselves, for our side as human beings we try to develop an art of living, that faces the constant elections and dangerously frequent innovations of ours to act as deliberate. The life that we try to preserve and to perpetuate is not a mere biological process but one to occur of symbols, which interweave in the shape of memory of community of code, of visions of future for finding the sense of every gesture and of every stumble.

But you have not asked yourself about the love really really quite we look for it, what sometimes it destroys us or impels us to destroy, also it comes from feelings, in such a way that it allows us to live like mortal or it mentioned that for everything the others living, there exists the suitable thing, the inadequate thing, the favorable thing and the harmful thing. But between human beings we prefer speaking of good or the bad thing because there is the rational intensity and not the laws of the nature, who establishes the agreement between what it is chosen, that is to say this free will, which constitutes the most intimate and problematic form of the freedom for which we define ourselves. In the search of the good thing that constitutes our rational commitment with the life, it is not enough to say, that we can incur errors or insufficiencies, but the circumstances that conspire against us, so that the free will, it does not remain in a pious con, we have to make open and effective the possibility of the bad thing, like a contradiction that overwhelms us but, as something favorite, as action under our conscience, which protects the justice of the morality with knowledge of the facts.