Rumors run rife in the anonosphere regarding the outage. What is demonstrable is the post explaining that JPMorgan is being outed for trafficking child sex slaves for decades. I'm still trying to get a handle on the allegations, but reckon ya'll can consider these matters for yourself far better than I can do it for you.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23825094-jpmorgan-epstein-filing-lifted-redactions
The above is 30 pages of a court filing with some redactions, but it makes the allegations and who it's against clear, despite obfuscated details.
I am not through either of these sources yet, and not able to verify any of the allegations, but I have never considered that as my role. It's not a larp so I deliver the information so that ya'll can apply your superior consideration to mine to make relevant judgment. I have no doubt that JPMorgan, serially convicted for manipulating the PM markets, also regularly commits any number of crimes that bring other market advantages it's way, so see no ethical hurdles between management and any kind of criminal activity that might be alleged.
These allegations seem to have legs. Epstein is notorious for pimping kids to celebrities and politicians for blackmail purposes, buying sweetheart deals when he somehow managed to get convicted, and nothing I've read so far seems the least bit outlandish or beyond him or the corrupt goverments he dealt with - and we suffer.
There's very powerful reasons we have never seen Epstein's clients in flagrante delecto, and I hope we get to see all of them named and shamed.
Edit: As I'm digging through the docs, I find more infos. JPM is suing Jes Staley, it's former head of wealth management, for knowing about the Epstein sex trafficking and not telling them about it, for the entire sum they were sued for by Epstein's victims. Dunno why they are going to endeavor to prove that an agent of the corporation was aware of Epstein's perfidious crimes, but it is really obvious to me that keeping this case in the limelight isn't worth $290M, if Staley can even pay it.
Seems like a really stupid and bad move on JPM's part to me, that will drag their corporate name through the mud for as long as Staley can keep fighting the suit, and even threatens to air their privileged communications with legal counsel. LOL Whoever failed to predict discovery in this lawsuit would prove enormously harmful to JPM is a grade A moron poisoned to the core with toxic arrogance.
And that's a good thing.
Re-edit: and it just keeps getting better. Now they've proved to the USVI that JPM withheld information responsive to discovery requests, and courts tend to not like being kept in the dark about substantive matters.
