Russel Brand has been raising a ruckus for a while now, and recently he seems to have stepped over a line. Suddenly anonymous accusations are being made of sexual abuse and the enemedia have pulled an Alex Jones and banned him across the board. Except Twatter and Rumble. Since Musk owns it, Twatter got a pass (so far), but Rumble has no such pedigree, so the torches and pitchforks have come out for it's CEO, whom has adamantly refused to ban Brand just because he's being cancelled by the MeToo operation. England has reportedly threatened Chris Pavloski's arrest if he refuses to do the needful, and Rumble appears to be standing firm.
IMG source - youtube.com - Monark
Most of ya'll have never heard of Monark, whom I just heard of myself from @TalksaboutBrazil on Odysee, but what I gather from that link is that Monark has been cancelled by the Supreme Court in Brazil and has fled to the US, and Rumble is also refusing to ban Monark, regardless of threatened legal action. Now, Ofcom and the UK is a big market, but their recent move to require platforms to conform to the draconian censorship rules, no end to end encryption, everyone has to KYC to use platforms, etc., can probably be crushed by alternative media platforms resolutely all refusing to comply, because that would isolate the UK in an information bubble and force it to back down. But, the sudden duplication of action against Rumble by Brazil doubles the pleasure and doubles the fun for Rumble, and cuts that calf out of the herd for taking down alone. It also raises the specter of all national governments implementing identically onerous policies. The recent furor in the USA over it's attempt to impose a similar policy to 'save the children' won't reoccur if the rest of the world has forced media platforms to comply to those censorious policies and they are de facto already for American users. Ofcom and the UK couldn't stand alone, but Brazil jumping in changes the game. If more follow suit alternative media doesn't stand a chance.
Another interesting coincidence is that Australia has recently moved to implement the Voice investing Aborigines with ownership of all it's beaches, waterways, and maybe trees, or something. They were previously invested with Ayer's Rock, a famous landmark in Oz, and non-aboriginal people aren't allowed to step foot on it anymore. That reveals the actual reason to invest the Aborigines with these real properties, because that enables the government to itself seize that property and exclude everyone and everything from it on their behalf. If what it did to Ayer's Rock is an accurate rehearsal for it's recent move on beaches, rivers, and every blade of grass, this is clearly not a move to empower Aborigines, but to exclude humanity.
Well, @TalksaboutBrazil mentions the Brazilian Supreme Court (which seems to have taken over Brazil, and installed Lula right out of a prison cell into the Presidency) has made a similar move regarding natives in Brazil being able to take title to real property in Brazil. That's extremely alarming, happening in two unrelated polities in a short period of time, the first thought that occurs to me is what would the world look like if this policy were implemented everywhere?
It wouldn't look good for humanity. It would be the legal justification to round us up and put us in FEMA camps and 15 minute prisons.
BlackRock owns ~90% of the stock corporations of the world, and it has been the driving force behind the plandemic and all this crap, IMHO. Through the WEF it has tendrils sunk into the corrupt backsides of every national government in the world. The Anglosphere are sort of poster boys of WEF infiltration and commandeering of government. Canada's catering to it's First Peoples is notorious, as is New Zealand to it's Maoris (to the great detriment of the Moriori of the Chatham Islands, most of whom the Maoris ate). Let's not forget Klaus Schwab infamously named Putin amongst his minions, and the Russian Federation has been at the forefront of CBDC development, through Sberbank, pushed the jabs as hard as anyone, and is dancing a duet with NATO in the Ukraine that is enabling all manner of great resetting of economic paradigms, so near and dear to Larry Fink, hisself.
I think we are seeing the gloves coming off the NWO, and global policies being implemented across polities that are ripe for those specific developments. If I'm right Rumble will crumble, the whole world will follow Ofcom and end free speech forever - unless we prevent it, and we'll see other national governments implement similar land grabs in the name of indigenes, the USA following up on NAGPRA (excepting Hawaii, of course), and perhaps China in Xinjiang. These are dramatic changes in fundamental ways in which we live, not merely some woke sounding respect for indigenes, but total eviction from some of the most valuable land on the planet, and the end of free speech on every platform, whether they want to censor us or not. Regarding that last item, Hive is small enough it may linger longer before being targeted, and I may have to rethink my judgments about the oligarchy keeping it that way. If we see Rumble and a few others taking the knee, we'll have a better idea of what we're up against and have some time to prepare to be boarded. That's always the threat in a plutocracy, after all. I'm sure our peerless leaders are as ready to polish up their golden parachutes as they ever have been. I'm not sure how much good mere money will do them for very long in the NWO, but more money will probably be better than less money, at least for a while, eh?
*The PayPal Mafia is an integral part of this puzzle, and I highly recommend having a look at Charlie Robinson of 