No worries! That is great. Definitely keep in touch. The possibilities in lucid dreams are endless and well worth being studied. There are plenty areas that need to be researched. I find that most students who get in touch about wanting to do a thesis want to focus on topics that are a bit grand without much guarantee that it'd help the field progress since there is a lot of basic science research that hasn't even been done yet... Like the differences between lucid and nonlucid dreaming, objective qualitative measures of lucid dreaming, how to enhance induction rates using the techniques we already know work, etc. These more basic areas of study are more urgently needed imo, especially since getting enough data on lucid dreaming in the general or even high-interest populations (with the exception of narcoleptics) is pretty difficult. This makes it hard to come to any strong or meaningful conclusions about things like the healing potential of lucid dreams or more abstract topics). I do find it interesting that you are doing dream journal research with lucid dreamers though...Is that a retrospective study of dream content? I'm interested to hear more and hope you'll keep sharing your ideas in one way or another.
RE: A Conversation on Lucid Dreaming between Stephen LaBerge and Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche