Aslam O Alikum, Hi,
How are you my steemit friends today?? I am fine and happy, Hope you will be fine and happy in your love life, As you know that i always try my best to bring a unique and informative content for my stemmit friend.My today,s topic is about religion,Move the mosque one place to other place????Let,s read the content,
NEW DELHI: In another passionate intrigue to the Muslim people group, previous AIMPLB part Salman Nadwi emphasized his remain for an out-of-court settlement of the decades-long Ayodhya question, which as indicated by him has transformed into disease for the nation. In his letter, initially in Urdu, Nadwi said there were arrangements in Islam under which a mosque can be moved or exchanged to somewhere else, and refered to precedents for the equivalent from the Islamic history.
"There are arrangements, and points of reference in the Shariah whereby a mosque, for various reasons, might be exchanged to another property. A large group of contentions and bits of proof exist which bolster these arrangements," Nadwi said.
Indicating one such model, Nadwi said Umar, the second caliph of Islam, had moved a mosque to another area and built up a market of dates on its place. "The most grounded proof for this is the model set constantly Caliph. Hazrat Umar moved a mosque in Kufa to somewhere else and set up a dates-advertise at the place of the mosque," he said.
Nadwi said after 1947, the conditions inside India begun gaining a specific course and signs of this move were found in 1949 when divinities were set inside the premises of Babri Masjid to change over it basically into a sanctuary, where Namaz has not been conceivable over the most recent 69 years.
"These occasions unfurled when extraordinary identities of the Independence Movement were as yet alive. The development to assemble a lasting sanctuary in its place was started in 1990, in the end prompting both the pulverization of Babri Masjid and the awful loss of thousands of Muslims' lives. The circumstance has transformed into malignant growth for the nation," he said.
"In these conditions, just sitting tight for the judgment of the Supreme Court is neither a thorough nor an attractive arrangement.
"From the perspective of a mindful network, to make ready for changes and Dawah to individual compatriots in an environment of harmony, concordance and appeasement, the main route is to open discourse of exchanging the mosque from the site and make a consent to guarantee the wellbeing of different mosques and religious foundations all through the nation," he included.
He said touchy issues like these should be managed shrewdness, particularly in light of the fact that the Muslim people group in India has essentially been "diverted".
"It was and is the obligation of the Muslim people group to take measures with the end goal to illuminate any misguided judgments that their individual comrades may have. In this manner, keeping away from the methodology of conflict and struggle, the Muslim people group ought to have embraced the way of common exchange and more likely than not locked in even the hardliners in talk in the light of Hudaybia Treaty which is a critical point of reference in Islamic History and ought to be taken as a casing of reference," Nadwi said.
"The methodology that was for all intents and purposes received (and keeps on being sought after) demonstrated unfortunate not just on religious, social, Dawah related and network related fronts yet in addition for political and regulatory scene," the pastor said.
Nadwi, a noticeable Muslim researcher, with different pioneers had met the Art of Living organizer Ravi Shankar in February this year and communicated bolster for an out-of-court settlement of the Ayodhya debate and. He likewise bolstered AOL's proposition of moving the Masjid outside to somewhere else, following which he was sacked from the board by the AIMPLB.
Nadwi named his intervention converses with Sri Ravi Shankar as a positive and noteworthy move, which the Muslim board didn't bolster.
"The beginning of converses with Sri Ravi Shankar on the Ram Mandir and Babri Masjid question was a positive and noteworthy advance. Sadly, around then a few individuals from the All India Muslim Personal Law Board restricted these discussions. Whenever broke down, the position of the Personal Law Board has not been fitting on account of both the Triple Talaq and the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid question," he said.
He likewise encouraged the individuals who bolster his methodology on the Ayodhya issue to impart their insight with his Human Welfare Board so it can start a positive and useful talk in such manner.
If you like my content please upvote and comments my post ,,,I,ll be with you very soon with my new post thanks...