"existing or historical revenues" --> Do you have a reference?
"We're the most real token out there, website and all!" --> I could name 20 tokens that have/had a better appearance than you (EOS, Tezos, Nimiq, actually, all of them), with actual facts and not just blabla on their websites, AND actual whitepapers explaining the technology, combined with a serious team multiple times larger than yours (basically you, one dev, and someone who already left, who you still include in your slides).
"BTW, Veritaseum is currently the number 2 asset in the industry in market cap, the best performing token in the history of the industry" --> Last time I checked Veritaseum was on #18 on coinmarketcap.com - where did you read "number 2"? The best performing token in history is EÒS. Why would you lie so blatantly?
"Any IP protections? Patents filed?" --> You're also not providing any proof that you filed patents. Instead you present your patents like this: "COOL, TECHNICAL SOUNDING STUFF ON HOW TO DO AMAZING THINGS WITH THE BLOCKCHAIN THAT YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF BEFORE GOES HERE" --> So what else can people write about? Patents that are already filed are not secret anymore. Can you publish them now? If not, why not?
RE: Analysis of the Veritaseum Scam