Anarchy

With a moral justification for the complete removal of power anarchy is seen as a proper solution for fascism. If you think about it though in a totalitarian society the option for democracy is non existent. You cannot vote the society into benevolence, nor can you pay your way into it. The option is simply not possible except through 1 remaining means. The only means of democracy that is not inherited from a socially accepted construct. Violence.

This unironic display of power is justified in that it is a last resort means to a desperately needed ends. It is fighting fire with fire. So when the pendulum swings too far in one direction then its justified to swing the other direction before moving to an equilibrium so then why does anarchy seem to be rising in the west?

Anarcho-politics

So this is where things get tricky. I can't possibly boil down every single anarchist political system into a single post, but I am going to cover the ones I have been most exposed to. These are mainly libertarian anarchist ideas, but I also have studied a bit of european ideas on anarchy. The biggest differences seem to be ideas on private and public property. The ideas on well-being, civics duty, ethics, and political science in general don't differ too much between the two sides.