It's amazing that you guys get so many upvotes with so much erroneous info. We never had a coin for the ultra-coin.com venture. Ultracoin was a marketing moniker that was renamed to Veritaseum to avoid altcoin confusion. This was discernible with just a small modicum of reading, which you chose not to do or decided not to reveal.
CFTC changed their regulatory stance on bitcion which affected our client, so we pulled it to rewrite it, and we gave a detailed reason why and how. Again, just a little reading. In addition, since you are not privvy to the rewrite or how we are changing the platform, how do you come to the conclusion that nothing has changed other than the blockchain?
There's nothing wrong with not understanding the concepts or mechanics behind a venture, but you not only fail to understand it, you are filling in your knowledge gaps with lies and innuendo. Not very cool.
RE: Analysis of the Veritaseum Scam