I really like the way you've expanded on this subject. It gets difficult to discuss a topic when every single concept within it has been obfuscated. Depending who you are speaking with the terms law, morality, right/wrong, energy, positive/negative, consequence, cause/effect, all mean different things. If a person is not familiar with a word, it may not be perceived at all.
Most people in our society do not believe right/wrong and truth even exists, some believe we can't "know" anything. Combine this with a fearful, child-like, instant gratification based mentality and it gets pretty hard to communicate even the simplest of ideas to many. I get it - I was in that mindset in the not too distant past.
Unfortunately true knowledge can not be "taught" into someone, it must be "learned" into the individual. Until the student is seeking knowledge of their own volition, no true understanding will be attained. We need to lose our vested interest in the outcome of our research and be willing to prove ourselves wrong. If you are only looking to verify your belief system, this promotes a bias in your research. All Truths are evidenced in Nature.
As more people come to realign themselves with reality these concepts will be expressed from different perspectives and hopefully exponentially reach more people at a level that resonates with them.
It is irresponsible, although convenient, to accept a perspective simply because it relieves us of all accountability. Once you conquer fear you can realize that this accountability is actually the source of our creative power.
But how do you communicate this when we all speak our own version of any given language? Its necessary to define nearly every single word before you begin to communicate your idea, even then people will hear what they have conditioned themselves to hear.
"morality is rather tautological, and thus self-evident and irrefutable..."
I think subconsciously we all know this and on some levels act accordingly to get desired effects in our lives. People choose to maintain a state of cognitive dissonance, allowing them to pick and choose when and where the laws of Nature apply. This results in chaotic uncontrolled physical manifestation, which is quite apparent, and used as evidence by some to prove that morality does not exist because "bad" things happen to "good" people.
RE: Human Rights Are Not Subjective