A morphic field is a pattern of informational energy that determines how an object or living thing behaves. You can think of it as the line of coding that determines how software operates. Morphic Fields underlie the organizations of minds, bodies, crystals, plants, molecules, planets, solar systems, galaxies etc. They give things their shape, their form and their organization.
They are generated through repetition. In fact, morphic fields direct your personality’s behavior. When you repeat the same patterns of behavior, you are essentially creating a pattern of informational energy that normalizes your state of being. That is why you think, act and react in certain ways. Morphic fields also affect consciousness at a mass level.
monkeyeffect1920.jpg
The hundredth monkey effect shows how repetitive actions from a number of beings can affect the collective consciousness. A monkey was shown how to wash sweet potatoes and this behavior was quickly learned and repeated by all the monkeys in the same island. Then, monkeys on other islands that had no contact with the monkeys from the first island, started to wash their sweet potatoes in the ocean as well!!
This is one of the many examples in nature that prove that all life shares the same mind. Many people who have had deep spiritual experiences through meditation or psychedelic drugs would also see images/symbols from different cultures that they have never seen before and would confirm were real when back to waking consciousness.
This happens during such experiences because people enter deep mental states (delta/epsilon) that grant them a conscious connection to this collective consciousness. This collective consciousness is a sea of informational energy that can be tapped into. It is just a matter of being able to remain conscious in deep mental states like delta/epsilon and understand the language of the subconscious mind.
With the ability to mentally tap into any informational energy in the universe, you can tap into any field such as the field that produces testosterone or someone’s energy field to determine how they feel at that moment. You can even tap into the informational field of a random rock in the beach.
We are all one energy and the ability to connect to any existing concept is inherent in all of us. Just as it is possible to create a field that determines our personality, it is possible for us to create or alter morphic fields ourselves. The 100th monkey effect showed how a group of monkeys created a field that affected the consciousness of monkeys in islands many miles away. Just one person can do the same with the right ability.
How does an active field work?
An active field works by adding to and improving the informational field of whoever . A field is just a pattern of informational energy. It tells an object what to be, or a process how to be.
When a person adds an active field to their own informational field, the active field incorporates itself into their energy system: in the case of our rock, mentioned above, making them less likely to find themselves in dangerous situations and generally less likely to get hurt. Their informational field is changed while the active field is incorporated; it includes the information “I am hard to hurt” – which the world around them responds to because the field is ‘what is’ it is the information that interacts with all other informational fields.
For example: If I have a computer program and I add a line of code (or 2000) to it, my computer will respond differently to the program. In this way the original program is like our informational field, the new code is our active field, and the computer is the world in which the program exists.
Source: https://www.sheldrake.org/research/morphic-resonance/introduction
Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, is a biologist and author best known for his hypothesis of morphic resonance. At Cambridge University he worked in developmental biology as a Fellow of Clare College. He was Principal Plant Physiologist at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics and From 2005 to 2010 was Director of the Perrott-Warrick project, Cambridge.