Fundamentally, thank you for your passion. While I disagree and will refute your assertions, I want you to know that this discourse is extremely healthy when people refrain from making personal attacks toward one another.
"Net neutrality once again for the slow witted among us is a regulation that says all internet traffic must be treated equally." <--- This is a false argument. It claims that internet traffic has inherent rights. It doesn't. People have rights. If you want better access, find a competitor. If you can't because of zoning laws, then get out there and get vocal to your local community and local government.
"There also is nothing about net neutrality that helps or hurts the regional monopolies so it is kind of a shiny object argument." <--- Except for the fact that it's government regulation of the internet. Everyone keeps playing "just the tip" and pretending the government doesn't absolutely love to make up reasons to fear-monger you into supporting their control of whatever.
If you're unwilling to find out about your local governments zoning laws and how it impacts you, then you're merely parroting what the government wants you to.
Net Neutrality needs to be killed off. Adding government to anything creates more problems.
RE: The War against the already Open Internet (Part 2)