Fundamentally, thank you for your passion. While I disagree and will refute your assertions, I want you to know that this discourse is extremely healthy when people refrain from making personal attacks toward one another.

"The only think that is gauranteeing the type of open access to the Internet is net neutrality." <--- You mean the only thing guaranteeing "open access to the Internet" is government violence against any company that disagrees with following their rules. Effectively killing innovation and competition and raising prices.

"The FCC has always maintained that the ISPs had to treat Internet traffic equally and the ISPs did because they thought the FCC was authorized to regulate that aspect." <--- ISP's don't make assumptions about the law. It's either law or it's not. And since it's not, they don't need to pretend to behave in a certain way.

"What are you going to do if Comcast decides you have to pay as much for Netflix as you do for the cable tv subscription you are getting rid of?" <--- Seeing as this fear-mongering situation hasn't happened in the last several decades, I'm fairly safe in assuming it's not going to happen now. But if they were dumb enough to do this, I'm going to put blame where it belongs- my local government that prevented competition from reaching my neighborhood.

"I would rather have a governemnt agency oversseeing monopolistic companies" <--- Governments create monopolies.