Just when you thought that the Law&Crime Network on YouTube could not get any more sensationalistic than it is in the form of Jesse Weber, another so-called journalist comes flying out of the woodwork to insult our intelligence with her sermons against cross-generational sex involving teenagers, even when it is make-believe.
Below you will find a video about a 37-year-old Long Island teacher who got caught carrying on a sexually charged conversation online with what he thought to have been a 13-year-old girl who was hot for his body. Alex Rosen (also known as Chet Goldstein and Gordon Flowers) was involved in this same online sex-sting operation. I honestly had thought that Mr. Rosen had moved on to bigger and better things, but I guess I was wrong.
A 37-Year-Old Elementary School Teacher Is Arrested For A Thought Crime Involving A 13-Year-Old Girl Who Doesn't Even Exist
Here we go again. This time instead of the sensationalist from the Law&Crime Network being Jesse Weber, it was Sierra Gillespie. Isn't she a beauty? I mean it sarcastically. Her interview with a former prosecutor named Dan Schorr is equally as intellectually bankrupt as her entire narrative throughout the news clip.
1. Outrageously More Police Effort Into Thought Crimes Than Actual Sex Crimes Against Young Girls
In response to the video above, nowadays police are putting more of their efforts into pursuing civilians for thought crimes than going after actual rapists and sexual predators; and usually the perpetrators of these thought crimes similar to the one described in the video above are older men, whereas the actual people raping teenage girls in large numbers are underage boys themselves.
Mark Verity is a Joey Buttafuoco wannabe at worst who obviously had this urge and desire to revisit his teenage years in a sexually adventurous manner. There was no actual 13-year-old girl involved in his alleged crime. He wasn't an actual child molester.
A real 13-year-old girl would not pursue a married 37-year-old man if she were interested in older men. She'd be going to a Dahvi Vanity concert in that event to serve as a groupie instead.
Not too long ago a 12- or 13-year-old boy brutally raped the late Aubreigh Wyatt when she was 12 years old. It ultimately drove her to commit suicide. The police investigated the rape and decided to make no arrests.
Jesse Mack Butler brutally raped three underage girls when he was a minor himself. He even video-recorded himself doing it. The judge only sentenced him to 150 days (3 to 4 weeks) of community service accompanied by a few governmental services offered to him.
Fact has it that in the American culture, an adult man can get into serious trouble for engaging in a thought crime with a teenage girl that doesn't exist, whereas teenage boys younger than 18 years old can rape underage girls and either receive a very light sentence for it or no sentence at all. How is this even fair?
I guess the criminal justice system and court system in our nation believe that it is more important to preserve the make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity that too many Americans live in than it is to punish underage boys who commit violent and heinous sex crimes against pubescent and adolescent girls.
I don't like to badmouth Alex Rosen, although I realize that he hasn't been very popular these days with individuals that are dead set on cleaning up our criminal justice system and court system of all of their corruption. At the same time, I realize that his talents are better served with him going after sexual predators who engage in incest with their own small children than they are in waging his war against the Lolita trend.
I really wish that Mr. Rosen would go to elected officials and urge them to reform our inheritance laws across the nation so that parental testamentary freedom is abolished altogether in the United States and no survivor of incest or child abuse ever has to face a possible adult life of poverty and homelessness. I know he has the skills to do it.
The media and the police took no time in parading Mr. Verity in front of the cameras for seeking to do things with a make-believe 13-year-old girl that the average 14- or 15-year-old boy would never get arrested for doing. Meanwhile, the late Aubreigh Wyatt's underage rapist gets to live his life as though he never did anything wrong to anyone. Mr. Butler will experience a few inconveniences and disruptions in his life here and there until he is 19 years of age, but he'll never truly have to pay for what he did.
Don't we live in such a beautiful country? I make that statement with great sarcasm in mind.
2. No Child Molesters Present Here!
Mark Verity is not a child molester. So why do Sierra Gillespie and Dan Schorr speak as though Mr. Verity is going to explode in a mad rage and brutally rape every prepubescent child under 11 years old that comes in contact with him? That's exactly what they do on camera.
Yes, Mr. Verity is an elementary school teacher, but simply because he was flirting with a teenage girl online doesn't mean that he is going to go berserk and rape every toddler in sight. Whenever an adult man gawks at a 13-, 14-, or 15-year-old girl walking down the street in a bikini and notices that she's more precociously developed in her physique than some college girls he has known, it doesn't mean that he is going to kidnap and rape someone's 5-year-old child.
How did the United States become such a nation of raving idiots? Also, Mr. Verity is not going to go raping his toddler children either. He wasn't arrested for sexually molesting a little kid under 11 years of age. Hmmm. Maybe police should start investigating deadbeat teenage fathers of being a threat to small children.
The police are wasting all of these resources of theirs in an effort to sabotage this man's life for something that he probably would not have even considered doing if he had not been entrapped as he obviously was. At the same time, authorities and the courts have become lax about punishing underage boys for clearly violent sex crimes against teenage girls and even preteenage girls.
What about the child pornography? Ms. Gillespie revealed that it was AI produced. Therefore, no minors were really harmed from it.
My question is what were the age ranges of the minors that Mr. Verity had pornographic depictions of. In Germany, pornographic depictions of teenagers is referred to as juvenile pornography rather than as child pornography.
If I were to accuse the late Aubreigh Wyatt's rapist or Jesse Mack Butler of possibly possessing child pornography merely for looking at nude photographs of girls their own age, social-justice warriors would accuse me of being politically incorrect. Why does Ms. Gillespie get to call Mr. Verity a child predator but not get to call the late Aubreigh Wyatt's rapist and Jesse Mack Butler child predators? The girls that they raped were around the same age as Mr. Verity's non-existing victim.
Ms. Gillespie has a naive perception of what teenagers are really like. She appears to believe that there is no difference between teenagers and toddlers, but fact has it that a 13-year-old minor is not 5 years old.
As a good example in support of this same point, let's just say that one late night Ms. Gillespie were walking to her car through a dark parking lot and she saw a group of 5- and 6-year-old boys standing nearby. What do you think she would do? She'd probably ask these little boys what they were doing out so late and where were their parents. Her entire mood would be that of concern for their safety.
Now let's just say that Ms. Gillespie were walking to her car through a dark parking lot late at night and she saw a group of 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old boys staring at her. One of them had a switchblade. They looked rough, and they started yelling lewd remarks at her and catcalling her. What do you think she would do? She would probably rush inside her car and try to get out of that place as quickly as she could.
These two different scenarios demonstrate how diametrically different minors from those two age groups are. American society needs to stop perceiving that 13- and 14-year-old minors are the same age as 5- and 6-year-old children. It's a delusion from a make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity. This way of thinking is killing the field of journalism and content creation.
Police are wasting the American taxpayers' money on these meaningless crusades against perpetrators of thought crimes. None of us have time to think about the "What If?" questions with these futile online sex-sting operations, when actual underage boys are raping these young girls.
3. Final Thoughts
Most predator-catcher groups are domestic terrorists. It concerns me that police are actually beginning to recruit them, because it's as though domestic terrorism is finding its way into our criminal justice system. Our nation is in more danger than it could ever be because of it.
Despite what Dan Schorr states to Sierra Gillespie in his interview with her regarding the so-called integrity of law-enforcement officials and court officials in online sex-sting operations and the likes, people who have been involved in the legal process and the system itself have a much different story to tell. Watch the video below about the deceptive nature of online sex-sting operations and how our courts mishandle these cases.
Norman Michael Achin Describes How Cops Misuse Sex Laws Currently On The Books To Abuse And Railroad Innocent Civilians
As Mr. Achin informs, police will railroad innocent civilians in online sex-sting operations. The laws in our nation will protect these cops no matter what they do. The court system couldn't care less about the facts in most events
Now, as I've stressed in other articles, it is clearly wrong for an adult man to prey on a 7-year-old girl sexually; and he shouldn't even be sexually attracted to her if he is your average adult man. However, here is my point. Below is a picture of a 7-year-old girl or a little girl close enough to that same age.
There is no reason that any sane, decent adult man should be sexually attracted to this little girl. Moreover, she is way too young to date. She's not even old enough for puppy love.
Now if we're talking about a 13-, 14-, or 15-year-old girl, adult men are bound to find a girl that age attractive, especially if she has a figure on her that is equally as appealing as that of a woman in her early twenties or even more appealing than it. The girl in the video below is 14 years old, but she'd have even Alex Rosen's hormones pumping; and I don't say that as an insult against him.
A Teenage Influencer Does Nothing To Hide The Bare Facts About Her Genetic Gifts
We cannot keep pretending that many teenage girls don't have the same effect on adult men as they do on boys their own age. All the pervert-shaming in the world that any trolls and haters may direct against me for speaking the truth herein is not going to change the facts. I prefer reality over fairy tales that originate from the bowels of the Puritanical Establishment.
In Ms. Gillespie's video above, Mark Verity did tell Mr. Rosen and his colleague that he had a girlfriend when he was 15 years old and that she was his age. For that reason, it greatly bewilders me why Mr. Verity ever felt that he needed to revisit his adolescence.
It appears that Mr. Verity had a very sexually active life when he was in high school. Therefore, he doesn't fit the typical profile of a 37-year-old man who seeks sexual gratification from a teenage girl.
The fact of the matter is that there are 13-year-old girls who are sexually active on their own volition in this day and age, and they don't necessarily select partners from their own age circles. Why can't American society differentiate between a teenage girl being in a sexual relationship that is cross-generational and a tragic situation of an elderly man kidnapping a toddler from a playground to commit unspeakable acts against that innocent?
There is a world of a difference between these same two scenarios. However, way too many Americans choose to live in their puritanical bubble with respect to how they perceive these two different scenarios.
A YouTuber posted in the comments section of Ms. Gillespie's video above that Mr. Verity belongs in a wood chipper. Why? He didn't hurt anyone.
If I were to say that the late Aubreigh Wyatt's underage rapist and Jesse Mack Butler each belonged in a wood chipper, social-justice warriors would be accusing me of being politically incorrect left and right merely because they were minors at the time of their crimes despite that those two punks would deserve it. I'm beginning to believe that all these social-justice warriors and the likes threw their brains in wood chippers years ago in light of all the stupid things they say and do.
It doesn't help that sensationalists like Ms. Gillespie, Jesse Weber, and other journalists on the Law&Crime Network continue to misguide the public on issues related to teenage sexuality whether it be legal or illegal. I'm losing faith in the press and the media, including the media on YouTube. Their credibility is deteriorating. What about you? What do you think? Let me know in the comments section below.
This article has been copyright-protected.