Ladies and gentlemen? Here we have what initially seemed like merely another typical case of a 13-year-old schoolgirl meeting up with what seemed to be a 15-year-old young man and taking him home with her to have sex in her bedroom. In no way am I encouraging teenage promiscuity or teenage hedonism herein, but this is the world that we live in; and we need to be talking about it more frequently than we do.
The 13-year-old girl's father catches the young man in his daughter's bedroom and immediately realizes that this young man has been having sex with the daughter under this father's own roof. The father chases after the young man with a handgun and opens fire on him three times.
All right. I completely understand. The United States is the deadbeat teenage dad capital of the world, and it can only be expected that the 13-year-old girl's father is going to be boiling with rage toward this young man under the current circumstances.
If Todd Palin had known that Levi Johnston raped his daughter, Bristol Palin, back when she was only 16 years old, he probably would have gone after Levi Johnston with a shotgun. Then again, the above-described young man did not rape the 13-year-old girl. She invited him into her home and up to her bedroom for the two to have consensual sexual relations.
In case you don't know who Todd Palin is, he is Sarah Palin's ex-husband. Sarah Palin was the vice-presidential candidate on the Republican ticket in the United States back in 2008. She was also once the Governor of Alaska.
Another point I'd like to stress is that the 13-year-old girl's father could have been facing attempted child murder charges if he had successfully hit the young man with a bullet. He could have been charged with a crime anyway, because the young man never forced his way into his home. The 13-year-old girl sneaked him into the house.
Well, it turns out that the wind blew some luck in the 13-year-old girl's father's direction, because, lo and behold, it was later discovered that the young man was not 15 years old but rather 20 years old. Then, magically, the situation goes from being a case of classic teenage sex to being what some of Law&Crime Network's more intellectually bankrupt viewers will misidentify as pedophilia.
The young man is butt naked as he flees away from the 13-year-old girl's angry father. The police chime in because of a complaint about gunshot sounds in the night.
This entire event is taking place in Kentucky. Therefore, there were inventive ways that this young man could have gotten away from the police and hidden somewhere from them. They got lucky and found his vehicle parked somewhere and were eventually able to identify him.
Apparently, this young man was not having a good day. The police caught him. He was someone who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time, doing the wrong thing; but, no, he is not a child molester or a pedophile. You can get details about this news story from the video below.
Being Only 5 Years Older Than His Fake Age Doesn't Make This Young Man A Pedophile. It Only Makes Him Vulnerable To Statutory-Rape Charges
The suspect's name is Parker Dean Kramer. You look at his picture in the thumbnail of the video above, and you immediately see that he looks as though he could still be in high school. In fact, he seems like someone who has barely entered puberty. He looks like somebody's nephew or baby brother.
Does it give him the right to have sex with a 13-year-old girl that he obviously didn't know very well? Well, probably not, but let's look at the facts of the matter.
1. The Facts Of The Matter
When the above-described 13-year-old girl first met Mr. Kramer, he had her believing that he was only 15 years old. In fact, he told her that he was a student at a nearby high school.
Nonetheless, the criminal charges against Mr. Kramer are clearly trumped-up ones. The amount of bond ($250,000) that was imposed against him was ridiculously high. Where is Elon Musk to bail you out of jail when you need him?
In the comments section of the video above, a YouTuber who goes by the user name of YouTuber scottl.1568 posted:
So would it have been any better if he really WAS 15 years old? She's the one who invited him over. Dad needs to admit to himself that his little daughter is a slut-in-training...
YouTuber scottl.1568? Your remarks about the 13-year-old girl are somewhat harsh, but, nonetheless, you have the right mindset. If Mr. Kramer had actually been 15 years old at the time that he had sexual intercourse with the 13-year-old girl, this story would likely not have even made the news. That is, unless, of course, the young girl's father had struck the young man with a bullet and severely injured him.
If that were to have happened, then the father's name would have been mud instead. The public at large would have been throwing a pity party for Mr. Kramer. It's kind of like how journalists like Joy Behar treated Levi Johnston like some kind of glittering stud merely because he was a teenage father and was the same age as Bristol Palin when he was doing everything to ruin her life.
Nevertheless, the law and society are treating Mr. Kramer like the big bad wolf merely because he turned out to be five years older than what he had everyone involved initially in this incident believing. The criminal defense attorney that Jesse Weber interviewed in the video above said that the 13-year-old girl could claim at trial that she is suffering from Post-Traumatic Syndrome Disorder (P.T.S.D.) from the incident.
Mr. Kramer's criminal defense attorney could also come back and discredit the 13-year-old girl's claim of P.T.S.D. inasmuch as she had thought that Mr. Kramer was her peer while she was engaging in sexual intercourse with them. Then again there was a case in the Commonwealth of Virginia in which a 13-year-old girl fooled a 12-year-old girl into believing that she was a boy to convince the 12-year-old girl to have sex with her.
The 12-year-old girl in that Virginia case felt devastated after she found out that the 13-year-old minor she had sex with was really a girl instead of a boy. My response to this gray area of the law is that unless Mr. Kramer's alleged "victim" had an aversion to adult men beforehand, I don't believe that the prosecutor will get very far with an allegation of Mr. Kramer causing the young girl some kind of mental anguish.
In the comments section of the video above, a YouTuber who goes by the user name of ElMalito187 posted:
The ones vicitim shaming the 13 y/r are pedophiles themselves or pedophilic sympathizers. Nothing about this is okay.
Cheers 🍻
YouTuber ElMalito187? Have you lived a sheltered life? What does any of this have to do with pedophilia or the likes?
The 13-year-old girl had willing and wanting sexual intercourse with a young man she believed to be her own age, period. Teenage sex is not pedophilia, even when one of the partners is significantly older than the other one. You only need to look up the definition of pedophilia in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ("DSM-5") to know so.
Now, if anyone reading my article still disagrees with me on any of these points I make to contradict YouTuber ElMalito187, then I ask that you read the online publication titled The Paradox of Statutory Rape by Russell L. Christopher and Kathryn Hope Christopher from beginning to end. It's not that difficult to see this issue from a bird's-eye view.
So, YouTuber ElMalito187? You're a self-appointed psychiatrist. Did you know that practicing psychiatry without a medical license is highly illegal? You cannot legally diagnose or rather misdiagnose someone with pedophilia if you're not a licensed psychiatrist. Your actions are also highly defamatory in nature.
So, YouTuber ElMalito187? Let me get this. If a 14-year-old boy broke into your mother's residence and brutally raped her, would that make her a pedophile instead of a normal person? I mean, she will have had sex with a 14-year-old boy, even though it would not be willingly. It seems to me as though you're taking your statement in that same direction.
Now, don't get me wrong. Whenever a grown man grabs a 5-year-old girl into his car and rapes and sodomizes her, he deserves every indignity that the criminal justice system can throw his way. However, the video above is not a news piece about an adult man raping and sodomizing a 5-year-old girl. It's about a 13-year-old girl having willing sexual relations with a 20-year-old man she believed to be 15 years old. Let's not confuse the two scenarios with each other, because they're unrelated to each other.
Some of you may argue that a 13-year-old girl cannot consent. Then why does she magically acquire the ability to consent to sexual relations when the boy she is having sex with is either the same age as she is or close enough to it? Oh, wait a minute! I forgot! There's this thing called the difference in power dynamics according to age!
Well, I hate to disappoint any of you self-proclaimed child advocates out there who believe in this crap, but the situation is not as black and white as you may think it is in that same respect. There are 15-year-old boys who have been having sex since they were 12 or 13 years old, and there are 20-year-old men who have never had a girlfriend or as so much been in the arms of a girl or a woman in their entire life. In other words, there is no one-size-fits-all for these types of situations, and some 15-year-old boys are more sexually experienced than 20-year-old men.
Some of you may ask, "Why didn't Mr. Kramer look for a girl his own age to have sex with?" Duhhhhh!!! He looks as though he is barely in his teenage years. Whenever he flirts with a 19-year-old woman, she probably tells him to come back in 10 years inasmuch as she probably thinks that he is no older than 14 or 15 years old.
There is also this thing called hypergamy. If a 20-year-old woman has a boyfriend or a fiancé who is a 27-year-old stockbroker that makes a six-figure-a-year income, why is she going to date someone like Mr. Kramer? Mr. Kramer probably works at a McDonald's flipping burgers. If he's a college student, he apparently doesn't earn enough money at whatever job he has outside his classroom schedule to impress a woman his age.
When you consider the fact that Mr. Kramer could receive a lengthy prison sentence for doing something that would have been completely legal for a 14- or 15-year-old boy to do, and you take the fact that a police officer would probably get a slap on the wrist for the same offense, and then you also highlight the fact that the middle-school boy who forcibly raped the late Aubreigh Wyatt when she was 12 years old has never been arrested, you're left with only one question. That is, the elephant in the room here.
How can the American statutory-rape laws be anything but a political weapon rather than a legal measure to protect minors? Pedophilia has become less of a psychiatric disorder and more of a puritanical psyop ever since John Walsh co-founded the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and Oprah Winfrey pushed for higher statutory ages of consent throughout the United States and tougher penalties for violating the laws pertaining to them.
American courts and law-enforcement officials waste millions and millions of dollars on frivolous and malicious statutory-rape cases every year. Meanwhile, deadbeat teenage fathers become more and more abusive with their underage baby mamas every year, and nobody is doing anything to change the inheritance laws throughout our nation to protect real child-abuse survivors from being disinherited by their vicious parents.
2. The Grooming-By-Default Agenda
As I was surfing YouTube to find additional reports about this same incident involving Parker Dean Kramer, I stumbled across this one video from a YouTube channel named Apple Love Live in which a woman and a man were sensationalizing this same news story. Watch the video below.
Two YouTubers Demonize Parker Dean Kramer Into Something That He's Not
The female YouTuber in the video above insists that Mr. Kramer's actions scream deception inasmuch as he was a 20-year-old man who impersonated a 15-year-old high-school boy to convince a 13-year-old girl to have sexual intercourse with him. I'm not saying that he's completely innocent of such deception. However, this tactic works both ways.
Alisha Dean committed a deception back when she was 12 and 13 years old and she fooled adult men into believing that she was 19 years old so that she could lure them into bed with her. Why didn't the law punish her for that deception?
The two YouTubers narrating the video above claim that Mr. Kramer probably met the 13-year-old girl online. How would they know that? There haven't been any reports of the two meeting online. Even if they did live 90 miles apart in Kentucky, it's possible that they could have randomly met each other at a theme park where people travel long distances to.
What gets me the angriest about the two YouTubers in the video above is that they accuse Mr. Kramer of grooming. It's amazing how self-proclaimed child advocates are constantly and arbitrarily changing the definition of grooming to suit their own agendas.
I don't believe that anything Mr. Kramer did was calculated. He has a young-looking face, and his hormones got the best of him. However, he wasn't some dirty old man in a trench coat who approached a 6-year-old girl in a park or a playground. In contrary to what the two YouTubers contend, he didn't exploit anyone.
Hearing this same accusation against him causes me to ask this one question. If a 13-, 14-, or 15-year-old boy gets a 13-year-old girl pregnant and either bails on her or asserts control over her in an abusive fashion, why doesn't any of these self-proclaimed child advocates ever accuse that boy of grooming or exploiting the underage girl he impregnated?!
They will even go as far as chalking such a teenage boy's actions off as normal adolescent behavior. However, there is nothing normal about them. You usually get that same intellectually bankrupt comment from these self-proclaimed child advocates in which they ask, "Why is it always the boy's fault?!" I hate these people.
It's incredible how in our society, being the same age as a 13-, 14-, or 15-year-old girl somehow gives a young boy a license to harm a girl this young in every way possible. If any of you out there believe that what Mr. Kramer did was sick and twisted, then there is no getting around the fact that our society's permissiveness toward deadbeat teenage fathers has to be even more sick and twisted than that under identical standards.
Mr. Kramer may have flirted with social taboos, but I do not agree with the two YouTubers in the video above that he manipulated the 13-year-old girl maliciously. It was clear that if he had been a real 15-year-old boy, she would have gone ahead and had sex with him anyway. Therefore, she can't really call herself a victim of manipulation.
As far as I know, Louisiana is the only state jurisdiction that has laws against "child grooming." If these laws exclusively pertained to the victimization of small children under the age of 11 or 12, I would have no problem with them. However, because these laws extend on up to 17 years old, they're a recipe for teenage hedonists and sexually promiscuous teenagers to take wrongful advantage of such laws.
I hate to be sniping at Louisiana lawmakers for writing these same laws too broadly, because Louisiana is noteworthy for its forced heirship laws, which stop abusive parents from cutting their own children out of their will after their children report them to the police.
We as Americans need to keep these "child grooming" laws out of other state jurisdictions, because then our statutory-rape laws are going to go from bad to worse. I would like to see "statutory rape" be downgraded from a strict-liability offense to an intent offense in view of the fact that teenage minors are more sexually active than they have ever been in years past.
A criminal defense attorney should be able to use the prior sexual conduct of an alleged victim as a defense in a statutory-rape case if that prior sexual conduct involved criminality on the part of the alleged victim. If a 14-year-old boy breaks into the home of an elderly woman and he brutally rapes her, he shouldn't be able to scream "statutory rape" in the event that he has a tryst with a 37-year-old woman a year later.
I wholeheartedly disbelieve that a teenage minor should be charged with contempt of court if he or she refuses to testify against his or her adult significant other in a statutory-rape case against that person. It adds insult to injury when a prosecutor gets to charge that minor as an adult for it. It's as though these lawyers who are public servants want their cake and eat it too.
3. Final Thoughts
Should Parker Dean Kramer go to prison? Well, I realize that he did break the law. However, he didn't really harm the teenage girl with whom he had sex. If he receives a sentence of probation and lifetime sex-offender registration, he'd probably flee the United States to live abroad as Steven Robert Whitsett did after he realizes how much being on the sex-offender registry is going to turn his life upside down.
What is really bewildering about cases like that of Mr. Kramer is that these underage teenage girls never seem to get pregnant from their sexual involvement with these older men. On the other hand, they're always getting pregnant from having sex with boys their own age. How do you figure that?
It contradicts these so-called expert opinions that teenage girls who are too young to vote are more likely to get pregnant if they have a boyfriend who is more than two years older than them. I think that someone fabricated those statistics to serve an agenda that would draw people into a make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity.
Nowadays you can't even report the facts about these cases as they are. The mainstream media and femi-Nazis want you to report them in a way that stirs up a moral panic everywhere.
I know that I probably shouldn't keep bringing up the topic about the swarm of Reddit femi-Nazis that weighed in on one of my previous articles here on this writing platform, but I cannot help but to use them as a strong example of sheer ignorance and stupidity.
These Reddit femi-Nazis falsely accused me of pedophilia merely for reporting the facts as they are rather than as they wanted them to be. Hmmm. If I'm such a pedophile as they accuse me of, I'd be interested in knowing the names of all my alleged child victims.
Can these Reddit femi-Nazis tell me what their names are? Do they even know what their names are? The answer to both questions is NO, because these alleged child victims of mine don't even exist and have never existed except in these harpies' deluded minds.
So-called professional journalists become more and more irresponsible about reporting the facts about these sex cases here in the United States. It is better that we all rely on independent news outlets and actual investigative reporters instead of these idiots that are really tabloid mouthpieces at best.
This article is copyright-protected.