Both liberals and conservatives on both sides of the aisle have been complaining about the declining birthrate here in the United States and throughout the world. Single men are not falling in love anymore and searching for that one special woman to marry and with whom to start a family. The old-fashioned way of pair-bonding and procreating has become a world that no longer exists except in the minds of deluded individuals who live in a white-picket-fence fantasy world.
As a result of the rapid decrease of relationships and the decadence of the institution of marriage here in the United States, a trend has evolved from it in which single men are skipping over the entire ritual of dating, falling in love, getting married, and starting a family the traditional way; and these men are hiring surrogate mothers to bear their children. You can imagine that radical feminists are not happy about it, because they are dead set on ensuring that American men are as miserable as they can be.
I'm sure that Imani Forester will have something to say about this new trend in one of her YouTube videos sooner or later. Radical feminists and right-wing extremists have become strange bedfellows regarding this issue.
Hotheaded Americans will argue that a child should have both a father and a mother. However, in view of the scandals involving Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt, one has to question that school of thought inasmuch as there is currently an epidemic of abusive mothers here in the United States.
Of course, I'm not saying that all women make bad mothers. My mother was the best mother any young man could ever have. The problem is that there aren't that many mothers like her here in this nation anymore.
It's outrageous how radical feminists never question the integrity of single mothers. In fact, they encourage single motherhood. Why should single fathers receive any less respect?
1. Â Red-Pill Coaches' Advice Regarding Single Fatherhood And Surrogate Mothers
In his videos on his YouTube channel, Dan warns American men that traveling overseas to find the ideal wife is not always a guarantee of love and happiness in the relationships-and-marriage arena. He adds that such a foreign bride could bear your offspring and then disappear with it. Below is his video.
Dan Cautions Men Against Having A Blind Faith In Foreign Brides
Dan is not opposed to American men travelling overseas to find a foreign bride and then start a family. However, he merely feels that men need to educate themselves on the risks of doing so. One alternative that he does suggest is for men to skip over the entire ritual of pair-bonding and find a surrogate mother to bear their child. Below are videos of his in that respect.
Dan Provides Advice For Men Who Wish To Become Single Fathers With The Help Of Surrogate Mothers
One point that stands out in Dan's presentations in both videos is that hiring a surrogate mother to bear a man's baby can cost up to $100,000. It brings to mind a conversation that I had with an endodontist in which he told me that regenerating a tooth would cost that much money if it really does become available in Japan in five years.
My response to that fact is that if you don't have $100,000 to spend on a surrogate mother, you shouldn't be aiming to become a single father. Raising kids is expensive nowadays with or without a mother in the picture.
Below is a video from a YouTuber who goes by the user name of Average Man Unplugged. In it, he describes what he believes to be the upside and the downside of a single man hiring a surrogate mother to bear his child.
Becoming A Single Father Via A Surrogate Mother Is Still A Strong Commitment For Men
I don't buy into all the junk science about men being more likely to father babies with birth defects after age 35 or 45. However, most men probably don't want to wait until they're 80 years old to start a family; and if the love of their life doesn't come along to sweep them off their feet, hiring a surrogate mother to have their baby is going to become more and more attractive to them as the years roll by.
Merely because men become single fathers through surrogacy doesn't mean that these men are going to be single forever or that their children will be motherless forever. It has been reported that women are known to find single fathers to be attractive and pursue such men. Therefore, we're going to witness a dramatic decrease in mothers and a dramatic increase in stepmothers.
Also keep in mind that these young women who marry these single fathers will not rule out having a baby or two with these men. Therefore, these kids born from surrogacy will be likely to have half-brothers and half-sisters.
What I cannot get is why there are conservatives that are opposed to men becoming single fathers through surrogacy. These conservatives are always whining about the declining birthrate. We're not going to be able to go back to the old days, because we'll never have them again.
2. Â Overall Opposition To Surrogacy
Because conservatives want to bring back the family and remedy the decline in the birthrate here in the United States, I cannot understand why Candace Owens is opposed to it. Then again, I have serious doubts whether she is a strong conservative. Below is a video in which she is debating the topic with David Rubin.
Candace Owens Likely Wants A Baby Boom But Not A Dramatic Increase In Single Fathers Through Surrogacy
After watching his video, it becomes apparent that what Reed Uberman wants is to take American society back to the 1950s. I respect his opinion, but I cannot agree with it.
The point that Mr. Uberman makes about two gay men not being able to father a child together mirrors the opinions of the late Anita Bryant, particularly the ones that she voiced aggressively back in the 1970s regarding gays. You be the judge of how you feel about it.
I do wholeheartedly disagree with Mr. Uberman that surrogacy is a form of human trafficking. For him to say so is no different from him accusing adoption agencies of participating in human trafficking. Moreover, I think that we, as Americans, need to focus on the fact that social-services agencies are stealing babies from teenage girls all the time, before we even allow anyone to entertain the notion that surrogacy is a form of human trafficking.
What social-services agencies are doing to teenage girls throughout the United States is reprehensible, and it should not be happening at all. I don't approve of all the hype that Mr. Uberman is promoting that surrogacy could lead to children being used for sex and exploitation. Why aren't any law-enforcement agencies looking into that same possibility with babies that social-services agencies are snatching away from underage girls?
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children ("NCMEC") certainly doesn't seem to care about what happens to these same babies that social-services agencies snatch away from underage girls, and they should care about it inasmuch as it's their duty to care about it. They're more of a political organization than a child-protection one.
At the end of the day, the Federal government is not going to supply an aphrodisiac to all the lonely men in the United States so that they can conquer the hearts of women and cause them to want to marry them and start a family. I'm not mindless of the possibility that the declining birthrate could produce severe consequences for the planet in the not-so-distant future.
Nevertheless, even if Mr. Uberman were right about everything he states in his video, there is no getting around the fact that society may be confronted with the dilemma of having to choose the lesser of the two evils, which is surrogacy. Then again I'm an agnostic, and I don't believe in the existence of any devil.
Olivia Maurel is a product of surrogacy, and she is making efforts to get laws passed to abolish surrogacy throughout the world. However, she is getting backlash for it. Watch the video below.
A Gay Couple Snipes At Olivia Maurel's Mission Against Surrogacy
Well, we all likely know what the position of the LGBTQ community is regarding surrogacy. However, my main focus herein is how surrogacy benefits heterosexual men who have encountered little or no luck finding a girlfriend and a prospective wife.
The gay couple in the above video don't seem to be opposed to surrogacy being legally regulated, but they don't want it to be abolished altogether. I do like the fact that gay couples like them are standing up for their beliefs on this topic and speaking up about it. Nonetheless, we should also place equal importance on how surrogacy benefits heterosexual men who may never find love with a woman.
A YouTuber who goes by the user name of mary_syl did post in the comments section of the video above. Therein she posted:
You're very dismissive of Olivia. Your language is very telling too; "She's a troubled individual"... really? I suggest you look her up some more. "The woman who donated an egg"....umm no. It's not a egg donation, it's her biological mother who bore her in her body for 9 months, fed her, sheltered her, gave birth to her. Your dehumanising language is so incredibly telling and everything that's wrong with surrogacy. Thanks for showing that so clearly. Naturally the two of you can't be objective on this subject because you have a vested interest. That's not enough for you however - you need to be seen as moral too. Otherwise you wouldn't have done this video in such a way.
So rationalize it all you want: the moment you support surrogacy, you're opening the Pandora's box of a ghastly market. Surrogacy has created some of the worst exploitation of women worldwide. Children are NOT a transaction! Nobody is entitled to children. Privileged people outsourcing bodily risk to less fortunate women and then thinking "oh it is okay because we're paying for it" are selfish people who will cling to whatever cognitive dissonance serves to avoid the immorality and potential harm of their actions. It really is peak Western depravity. Everything can be bought.
Surrogacy is body slavery plain simple and on the same level as prostitution in terms of targeting and exploiting the marginalized! It shouldn't be legal anywhere because you cannot detach yourself from this side of it. And that's not even touching on all the potential issues the children can encounter later in life. It's pure selfishness by people who feel entitled to children. You're willingness to roll such a dice is proof of this.
And it's great you love your children and maybe they won't mind later in life - it doesn't change the fact that you were willing to participate in something that is deeply objectionable and harmful to so many women and children elsewhere.
You're not the good guys when you snicker about someone like Olivia and completely gloss over what's going on in parts of eastern Europe, Africa and India because surrogacy is already a for profit business - and guess who benefits the least. 👎
Wow! I've heard of right-wing extremists accusing people of being selfish for not wanting children. However, this is the first time I've ever witnessed an obvious right-wing extremist accusing someone of being selfish for wanting children. I guess nobody can please everyone in the world.
The above comment by YouTuber mary_syl brings to mind a scene in the science-fiction novel titled Endless Voyage by Marion Zimmer Bradley in which a fleet of space travelers in the distant future have recently purchased a baby from a baby peddler inasmuch as the cosmic radiation they encounter in outer space renders them sterile. For one reason or another, they have to use the matter-transmitters to get back to their spaceship in that one scene.
When the matter-transmitter they're using discovers that they cannot be routed through another matter-transmitter on a planet because there is too much traffic going to and from it, it informs them that they're being rerouted through a different planet. Much to their dismay, there are violent demonstrations occurring on that other planet. In fact, when they are teleported to it on their way to the planet where their spaceship is, they encounter violence and the protesters accuse them of being baby traffickers.
If I remember the scene accurately, one of the crewmembers is injured and possibly even killed. Please forgive me if my recollection of that same scene is not completely accurate, because it has been quite a while since I've read this book. If anyone has read it recently, please do feel free to correct me on my recollection of that same scene.
Ms. Bradley was a genius, because she clearly was able to see into the future and predict the adverse impact that the evolution of science and technology would have on societies. She was the author who inspired me to become a science-fiction novelist.
3. Â The Elephant In The Room Here
The question continues to linger as for what kind of woman would offer to become a surrogate mother for single men or for anyone for that matter. Single men are going to want young, healthy, attractive women to act as surrogate mothers for their future children. Who are those women likely to be?
Probably many of those surrogate mothers will be women barely in their twenties who are on the sex-offender registry. Considering all the attractive female schoolteachers who fit that same description are getting into trouble for having sexual relations with their middle-school students or high-school students, there will continue to be an abundance of them on the sex-offender registry.
These young women on the sex-offender registry throughout the United States are often strapped for money, because they have a very difficult time finding another job after they lose their teaching credentials and they have a police record. Nobody wants to hire anyone on the sex-offender registry.
The advantage that single men will have in enlisting these same types of women to have their babies is that these women will have no way of breaking out of their contracts that keep them out of the offspring's life. If they try to win custody of the baby later on in the event that they have a change of heart, no judge is going to find them to be fit mothers inasmuch as their convictions for sexual crimes involving minors will be hanging over them like a ton of bricks.
Radical feminists will not like single men being able to skip over the entire scene of dating, romance, love, and marriage in their pathway to fatherhood. They don't like for any man to be happy for one nefarious reason or another. They'll accuse single men of exploiting these women on the sex-offender registry in that event.
Over in the United Kingdom, a radical feminist named Julie Lindel has already publicly condemned surrogacy as an alternative to natural procreation. Watch her in the video below.
A Radical Feminist Speaks Out Against The Legality Of Surrogacy
My response to the backlash from radical feminists is that they wanted harsh sex laws that put young female schoolteachers in these humiliating predicaments. They fought to get these draconian sex laws on the books. Therefore, they're not really in a position to complain about the benefits that single men can reap from the end results of such actions.
Perhaps these radical feminists can do the sensible thing and urge elected officials to downgrade the so-called crime of "statutory rape" from a strict-liability offense to an intent offense instead and to discontinue treating it as a felony. While they're at it, they could also urge elected officials to lower the statutory age of consent to 13 or 14 years old in every state jurisdiction of our nation.
More than enough people get railroaded by these stupid sex laws here in the United States. Perhaps alleviating these same laws would bring some sanity to our nation.
Of course, radical feminists aren't going to do any of those things, because they want their cake and eat it too. They also don't want to have to compete with teenage girls for the affections of adult men.
What makes no sense about their mindset is that if a minor rapes an adult woman and that minor falsely screams "statutory rape" afterwards, that woman could be indicted for a crime she didn't commit in that regard. It's explained in the online publication titled The Paradox of Statutory Rape by Russell L. Christopher and Kathryn Hope Christopher.
Radical feminists simply resent that their mission to harshen the sex laws in our nation has finally backfired on them and could be allowing for men to feel a certain sense of autonomy and independence from their shenanigans in the dating market. Then again, radical feminists are likely going to seek laws against surrogacy, if not seek laws to make it illegal for young women on the sex-offender registry to become surrogate mothers.
Their egos are going to cause a major conflict within their own femi-nonsensical circles. I can see it happening already. It'll be hilarious to watch them go against one another like a bunch of vicious cats.
4. Â Final Thoughts
Times are changing, and, as Americans, we all need to learn to change with them. Unfortunately, there are religious zealots that are trapped in the distant past who sharply oppose any sort of scientific and societal progress.
Surrogacy may end the declining birthrate in the United States and throughout the world, and religious extremists aren't even interested in that route despite that they want to stop the population implosion. We're not going to save humanity by allowing for large clown-car families like the Duggars to thrive. Those families are usually disasters.
Before we allow for surrogacy to go away forever, we all need to keep our minds open to the benefits and advantages of it. The church isn't always right about everything. In fact, it is wrong more often than anything.
If you're a man and you're single, you probably wonder if you'll ever become a parent. If you can't find a woman to make that goal in life come to fruition, it is your right on whether you wish to consider going down the route of enlisting a surrogate mother to make it possible.
Never mind what Reed Uberman has to say about surrogacy. He doesn't have all the answers, and he hasn't walked in your shoes.
If you follow me here on this writing platform, you should realize that I am no major fan of statutory-rape laws. In any event, it is those same harsh sex laws that have made an entire pool of potential surrogate mothers available to single men who want to become fathers.
Should you be concerned about whether these same women have mental problems? If they committed a really heinous sex crime, then you should avoid them at all costs. However, if they got into serious trouble for some casual tryst with a horny 14-year-old boy, they would likely be no more psychologically unhinged than the First Lady of France, Brigitte Marie-Claude Trogneux Macron, is, which she isn't. In that case, I'd say that you have nothing to worry about. Use your better judgment.
If all these do-gooders were really concerned about the declining birthrate, they'd help these homeless people get back up on their feet again. If these homeless people were working and had roofs over their heads again, then perhaps they'd be able to afford to get married and start a family. That would solve the problem with the decline in the American birthrate.
Then again, people who do have jobs and homes struggle to afford the cost of living. It could be why they're not getting married and starting a family in droves. Of course, that's another article for another time.
This article is copyright-protected.