1. Miscarriage Of Justice And Double Legal Standards
I keep telling myself and my followers that I'm going to avoid the topic of politics, but here I am again delving into it. What can I say? Politics is everywhere in the American culture, and the subject of the late Renee Nicole Good's death is no exception.
It turns out that the late Ms. Good's killer, Jonathan Ross, was never arrested for murdering her, and he is not in jail. Watch the video below.
Norman Michael Achin Complains That Jonathan Ross Is Not In Jail
Norman Michael Achin has every right to complain about the impunity of Mr. Ross, because Mr. Achin himself was railroaded under the American sex laws due to no fault of his own. Fact has it that if a man the exact same age as Mr. Ross had gotten caught in an online sex-sting operation for attempting to meet up with a non-existent 15-year-old girl to do something with her there in Minnesota that would be perfectly legal for a high-school boy to do, that individual would now be sitting in jail.
An adult man would not be arrested in most European nations for having a tryst with a 15-year-old girl. However, if a government official shot and killed someone in cold blood, the criminal justice system in most of those same nations would bring the wrath of the law down upon him.
Here in the so-called land of milk and honey, a judge would likely have set the bail for an adult man arrested in an online sex-sting operation at an unreasonably high amount of money and the only way that such an individual would make bail would be if he had a bondsman that was willing to pay the exorbitant amount of money to get him out of jail. On the other hand, Mr. Ross has not even been arrested for what he did. Now, how do you figure that? Something simply doesn't fit the picture here.
To any of you wood-chipper enthusiasts out there, allow me to set you straight on something. A suspect in an online sex-sting operation would pose much less of a danger to your 15-year-old daughter than Mr. Ross would.
If a suspect in an online sex-sting operation were to come into contact with your 15-year-old daughter, the worst he would likely do would be to flirt with her. She would probably tell him that she wasn't interested in older men, and that would be the end of it. If Mr. Ross were to come into contact with your 15-year-old daughter and she even as so much parted her hair the wrong way, he would likely blow her head off.
The American criminal justice system has so many double standards that it isn't even funny. Someone can get into bigger trouble for committing a thought crime than they can do so for actually committing a real one as Mr. Ross did. It makes me so furious.
It has been reported that Mr. Ross's criminal defense attorney is going to explore every single, solitary loophole he can find in the law books to get him acquitted of any criminal charges for murdering the late Ms. Good. Below is a video in which an attorney talks about it.
A Lawyer Describes The Loopholes That Jonathan Ross May Manipulate To Escape Justice
While I agree that everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and that everyone is entitled to a fair trial as well as adequate legal representation, somehow I don't find those same legal principles being applied to cases involving defendants who have been caught in online sex-sting operations. Somehow even the most innocent of defendants in sex-related cases always get placed into no-win situations in our court system.
Despite that Mr. Ross is an evil, cold-blooded killer, he doesn't seem to have any difficulty finding supporters to stand behind him in the adjudication of this matter. On the other hand, the American courts don't seem to care whether a suspect in an online sex-sting operation is innocent or guilty. They merely want to get a conviction against him and move on to their next case. If you don't believe me, watch the video below.
Norman Michael Achin Describes How It's Easier For Police To Create A Crime Than To Solve One
I guess sex sells more than murder does in our criminal justice system. Mr. Ross certainly seems to want to prove so.
2. The President's Role In This Matter
Some of you may be asking, "What about President Donald J. Trump?" My response to that question is, "What about him?"
Yes, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") is withholding evidence against Jonathan Ross from Minnesota prosecutors. However, do you honestly believe that President Trump is to blame for it? I don't.
The FBI has had it out for President Trump for years. Every time an assassination attempt has been made against him, the FBI has acted casual about it as though he would be no major loss to them. Now that he's in the Oval Office again and he wants to shake them up and down to stop their corruption, they're on a warpath against him. What more perfect of a plan could they have than to make it look as though he is trying to get Mr. Ross off the hook?
The FBI knows that if they throw roadblocks against Minnesota prosecutors securing a conviction against Mr. Ross and they manage to get President Trump blamed for it, it's all going to do a colossal amount of damage against President Trump and his presidential administration in the mid-term elections this year. That is, if Democrats take over the House and the Senate on Capitol Hill, President Trump is likely going to find himself facing another impeachment hearing, and the FBI will be egging elected officials on to remove him from office.
After Kash Patel became the FBI director, he obviously was able to see that ridding the FBI of all its corruption was a much more monumental mission than anyone could have ever undertaken. Pam Bondi is going through the same ordeal as the United States Attorney General in her efforts to clean house at the United States Department of Justice. The United States Department of Justice is like the American version of The Third Reich, and the FBI is the American version of the Gestapo.
The FBI higher-ups working below Mr. Patel are snakes, and they're out to get rid of President Trump and destroy him any way they can do so. President Trump could put a devil fork in their backs for doing so by defunding the Internet Crimes Against Children ("I.C.A.C.") program in their war against teenage sex and pushing to pass a Federal law that would require each and every Chris-Hansen-style online vigilante and "predator" catcher to obtain a private investigator's license. He has the means to do it in his capacity as our Commander-in-Chief.
I don't agree with everything that President Trump has done ever since he entered the Oval Office. I don't like the idea that his Big, Beautiful Bill's passage has threatened individuals with the prospect of losing their Medicaid. Then again, I'm all in favor of Universal Healthcare, and I don't really like the idea of anyone having no medical insurance coverage at all. However, I don't want President Trump to fall prey to all the vicious plots that the FBI has connived against him.
3. Final Thoughts
As the drama continues to build up with the way our criminal justice system plays by its own rules instead of by the rules that lawmakers set down for it, more and more stories about injustices surface in the press and in the news media. If Jonathan Ross walks away from his crimes as a free man, it won't sit right with me that people are getting locked up because of frivolous and malicious sex laws that don't really have the best interest of the American people at heart.
Many teenage girls have had beautiful relationships and even marriages with older men in spite of all the unfounded pedophile-panic propaganda floating around out there. However, how many people can say that the late Renee Nicole Good was happy that Mr. Ross shot and killed her? Nobody can.
This article is copyright-protected.