The other day I stumbled across a news clip from the Fox Business cable channel on YouTube. It was warning Americans about the rapid decline in the birth rate here in our nation. Would you believe that the title of this news clip on YouTube was "Gen Zer explains why her generation is screwed when it comes to sex"? I put all three words in bold in the title, because I believe that the person who posted this video on YouTube wanted everyone to make a connection in meaning between the three words. Here is the video below.
Fox Business Warns The American Public About Our Nation's Dramatic Decline In The Birth Rate
Now, every time I have sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the highway, I somehow seriously doubt that human extinction will happen in any of our lifetimes. In any event, notice that when the newscaster delivers a chart regarding U.S. fertility, it reads as "# OF BIRTHS PER 1,000 WOMEN AGES 15-44." That's right. It refers to 15-, 16-, and 17-year-old girls as being women. And why shouldn't it?
Girls between 15 and 17 years of age are in their childbearing years. Most of them are full-figured women. None of them are still watching cartoons and playing with coloring books. Most of them are seeking a young man with whom to pair-bond.
So, how does it make any sense for any state jurisdiction within our nation to set its statutory age of consent any higher than 15 years old? Our elected officials could solve the said problem of declining birth rates and population implosion by lowering the statutory age of consent to 15 years old in every state jurisdiction of the United States. This is something that feminists like Jennie Gage simply don't get.
Now, I know what some of you parents are probably thinking. If the dreaded day were ever to come that you discovered that your 15-year-old daughter was pregnant, you would simply go ballistic if you found out that an adult man in his twenties or older was the one who got her pregnant.
I'm not expecting any parent of girls that young not to have their fair share of concerns. American parents have been brainwashed into believing that their 15-year-old daughter will be so much better off with a boy her own age no matter how abusive he gets with her.
Most unforunately, it has been programmed into our cultural fabric always to think the worst of a situation in which an adult man has gotten a 15-year-old girl pregnant. However, do you actually believe that sending such a man to prison is going to alleviate the situation?
It is bad enough whenever some underage punk gets a 15-year-old girl pregnant and then either bails on her or bullies her with the help of his friends. If a man in his twenties has gotten a 15-year-old girl pregnant and wishes to step up to the plate and help support the baby, sending him to prison and sticking him on the sex-offender registry for all eternity are not going to make it easy for him to own up to those same responsibilities.
Cross-generational relationships between teenage high-school girls and adult men do not constitute pedophilia regardless of what some self-appointed psychiatrists and wood-chipper enthusiasts may have to say about them. To know so for a fact, all you have to do is look up the actual defintion of pedophilia in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ("DSM-5"). A 15-year-old girl is considered to be a consenting adult in most European nations, and those societies seem to get along fairly well.
Internet Crimes Against Children ("I.C.A.C.") investigators and "predator" catchers absolutely love higher statutory ages of consent, because they bring business their way. If they could convince elected officials to raise the statutory age of consent to 35 years old everywhere in the world, they would do so. They don't have the best interests of the American people at heart. Norman Michael Achin tells it all in his video below.
Norman Michael Achin Explains How I.C.A.C. Investigators Use Similar Dirty Tactics As I.C.E. Agents Do To Apprehend People
For any of you out there who don't know what I.C.E. is, it stands for Immigration and Citizenship Enforcement. Like I.C.E., the I.C.A.C. Task Force has been spiraling out of control for years.
Whenever a sex scandal involving a teenage minor breaks in the American news, the press and the media both have a field day with it. However, they couldn't care less about the public interest. They only want to sell a story as aggressively as they can regardless of whether or not it is completely accurate. Like with the I.C.A.C. Task Force, it's all about the money with them. Mainstream journalists have become callous in recent years here in the United States.
If every U.S. state jurisdiction decides to lower its statutory age of consent to 15 years old or younger, sure, it's going to take away business from I.C.A.C. investigators and "predator" catchers. However, they have had their walk in the sun, and they have done virtually nothing beneficial to the public interests. It's time for their game to be over.
Generation X experienced a myriad of forbidden relationships with older sex partners back during their teenage years, because they were the latchkey kids and they had more than enough time to share their bedroom action with their older sex partners while their parents were still at work. Not as many adult men were going to jail or prison on statutory-rape convictions back then, because there were still state jurisdictions where the statutory age of consent was lower than 16 years old.
Nowadays most teenage minors appear to have helicopter parents who monitor their every activity. The Millennial Generation and Generation Z can thank idiots like Julie Posey and Chris Hansen for that.
I find it somewhat difficult to believe that Gen-Z men have no interest in sex. In the first video above, the Fox Business newscaster and Rikki Schlott look at every possibility that could be causing the rapid decline in the U.S. birth rate other than the one that is most obvious. The statutory ages of consent are way too high here in the so-called land of milk and honey.
An app named "Score" for dating people with good credit is not going to solve the problem with the low birth rate. The majority of us likely believe that potential partners who ask for your credit score are certifiable head cases. It's equally as invasive as asking someone what their body count of sex partners is before dating them. Naturally, people are going to see something like this as being so uncool.
Regarding parenting and childbearing, Ms. Schlott appears to be of the school of thought that if you can't afford to feed them, then you shouldn't breed them. I respect her point of view, although I don't believe that such a topic is as black and white as she perceives it to be.
I can candidly assert that troublemakers like Fraidy Reiss of Unchained At Last and Jeanne Smoot of the Tahirih Justice Center are contributing to the dramatic decline of the birth rate here in the United States in their mission to outlaw teenage minors from getting married anywhere in our nation. I strongly feel that it is not their place to be tampering with marriage laws that have been on the books for decades, even centuries. It is ironic that they are doing so for the sake of archaic statutory-rape laws.
Fact has it that whenever an adult Gen-Z man walks into a nightclub or some other social outlet and he sees beautiful girls like the ones in the video below, he's not always going to think about asking any of them for their I.D. to find out if they're of legal age before he takes one of them back to his residence for sex. Even if he does so, chances are that they will be carrying fake I.D. on them.
Attractive Teenage Models Show Off Trendy Clothing In An Outfits Shop
I would never recommend that any single adult man have sex with a woman that he just met. Of course, everyone has their own set of morals and values. No two adult men are alike. In any event, nobody knows what kind of nonsense young adult men have to go through nowadays to find a girlfriend other than young adult men themselves.
If elected officials were to lower the statutory age of consent in every state jurisdiction here in the Union, there would be fewer adult men going to prison on statutory-rape convictions merely because they mistook a 15-year-old girl for a 19-year-old woman at a nightclub where only adults over 18 years of age are supposed to be. Ignorance of age is a major factor in adult being unfairly convicted of statutory rape.
If a 23-year-old man were to show interest toward any of the young girls in the video above and any of them wanted to have sex with him, you can be rest assured that probably none of those girls would be truthful with him about their ages if they were still minors. The 23-year-old man's hormones would disallow his brain to exercise common-sense judgment in the matter, and he would be entirely clueless of what he was doing until police officers were pounding on his front door afterwards.
It happens all the time. It doesn't mean that these underage girls are bad people or are sexually promiscuous. It only means that when teenage minors of the female gender want an older man as a sex partner, they will go to whatever lengths to fool him into thinking that they're above the statutory age of consent in their particular jurisdiction.
As Americans, we all need to stop feeling afraid to talk about controversial issues of a sensitive nature. No matter how we look at this topic, American statutory-rape laws in their present form are killing our society and devastating our economy in one way or another.
Elected officials should not be afraid to give a listening ear to voters who feel that the statutory age of consent is too high in their state jurisdiction of our nation. Even if elected officials were to put this question on a ballot as a referendum of any kind, it would be a step in the right direction for everyone. Then each and every voter could decide with their conscience what the law should read without outside pressures from their peers.
No, we don't have to turn our nation into a playground for sexual predators. However, we should still make every effort to live in the real world rather than in the make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity that self-appointed psychiatrists, self-proclaimed child advocates, wood-chipper enthusiasts, and the likes continue to shove down our throats.
Now comes the million-dollar question that some of you have been yearning to ask me. If every state jurisdiction of our nation were to lower its statutory age of consent to 15 or 14 years old, should elected officials impose a maximum age difference between underage sex partners over the statutory age of consent and adult sex partners in that event? My answer is no.
Merely because there is no maximum set age difference for a consenting teenage minor in a state jurisdiction where the statutory age of consent would be 14 or 15 years old, it doesn't mean that a 15-year-old girl is going to jump into bed with a 99-year-old man. Girls that young are probably not going to be seeking out sexual relationships with men older than their fathers, so I say for lawmakers to leave well enough alone if and when they do lower the statutory age of consent to 14 or 15.
This article is copyright-protected.