I'm going to presume you're a real person - and mean what you say. (In some other internet dialogues - that is not the case)

I 100% do not fault you for your incredulity.

From where I'm sitting - I'm not at all confident in the guilt or innocence of the people inculpated in Jon Podesta's emails

a reasonable person could conclude that there IS a preponderance of evidence warranting a formal inquiry .

a reasonable person could conclude that there is not. (and I wouldn't lose my composure upon that person)

if you trust that I'm not being adversarial about it (because I'm really not) - I'd be completely open to a public or private debate on the objective facts of this situation

discussing things is underrated

relishing in adversarial enmity is overrated

I appreciate your candor and objectivity - and wish the very best for you while you run this gauntlet of data

in the broader picture - I don't know - forgive me for assuming you're unfamiliar with these things if you are familiar with them:

hang in there man